Nexen Energy ULC v. EDS Decommissioning Canada Inc. (Bankrupt) et al.,

JudgeMason
Neutral Citation2015 ABQB 271
Citation(2015), 615 A.R. 245 (QBM),2015 ABQB 271,615 AR 245,(2015), 615 AR 245 (QBM),615 A.R. 245
Date18 February 2015
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)

Nexen Energy ULC v. EDS Decommissioning (2015), 615 A.R. 245 (QBM)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2015] A.R. TBEd. MY.046

Nexen Energy ULC (applicant) v. PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc., in its capacity as Trustee to the Bankruptcy of EDS Decommissioning Canada Inc., Hydro-West Scaffolding Ltd., Tarpon Energy Services Ltd., Tri-Venture Construction Ltd. and Chinook Scaffold Systems Ltd. (respondents)

(1401 05227; 2015 ABQB 271)

Indexed As: Nexen Energy ULC v. EDS Decommissioning Canada Inc. (Bankrupt) et al.

Alberta Court of Queen's Bench

Judicial District of Calgary

Mason, Master

April 27, 2015.

Summary:

Nexen contracted with EDS to decommission a gas plant. EDS subcontracted various work. EDS went bankrupt. Four unpaid subcontractors filed liens against Nexen's lands. Section 43 of the Builders' Lien Act provided that a registered lien "ceases to exist" unless, within 180 days of registration, an action was commenced to realize on the lien and the lien claimant filed a certificate of lis pendens. Two subcontractors (Hydro-West and Tri-Venture) complied with s. 43. The other two subcontractors (Chinook and Tarpon) did not. Following an application by Nexen under s. 43(5), the Registrar discharged the liens of Chinook and Tarpon. Chinook and Tarpon applied to reinstate their liens. Hydro-West and Tri-Venture opposed the application.

A Master of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench dismissed the application. A registered lien that ceased to exist could not be reinstated absent express statutory authority. The Master held that there was insufficient evidence of conduct supporting the application of principles of waiver and estoppel.

Mechanics' Liens - Topic 5486

Obtaining a lien - Lis pendens - Effect of failure to file - See paragraphs 1 to 43.

Mechanics' Liens - Topic 5527

Obtaining a lien - Commencement of action - By filing a statement of claim - See paragraphs 1 to 43.

Mechanics' Liens - Topic 6906

Loss or discharge of lien - General - Reinstatement of - See paragraphs 1 to 43.

Mechanics' Liens - Topic 6983

Loss or discharge of lien - Loss by operation of statute - Expiration of time period - See paragraphs 1 to 43.

Counsel:

Geoffrey Boddy (Jensen Shawa Solomon Duguid Hawkes LLP), for Chinook Scaffold Systems Ltd.;

James P. Flanagan (McLennan Ross LLP), for Hydro-West Scaffolding Ltd.;

Patrick D. Fitzpatrick (Burstall Winger Zammit LLP), for Tarpon Energy Services Ltd.

This application was heard on February 18, 2015, before Mason, Master, of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, Judicial District of Calgary, who delivered the following judgment on April 27, 2015.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 practice notes
  • Homes by Element Construction Ltd (Re), 2017 ABQB 442
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 13, 2017
    ...the proper approach to interpretation of the Act as set out in Master Mason’s reasons in Nexen Energy ULC v Pricewaterhousecoopers Inc, 2015 ABQB 271 (“Nexen”). In those reasons TRG is discussed as follows: [24] These doctrines should only be allowed to overcome a statutory temporal require......
  • Livello Project Inc v Ku, 2018 ABQB 418
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 25, 2018
    ...[17] This conclusion is consistent with the decision of Master Mason in Nexen Energy ULC v EDS Decommissioning Canada Inc. (Trustee of), 2015 ABQB 271, 2015 CarswellAlta 782 where she declined to reinstate liens which had been removed by the Registrar of Land Titles for failure to file a [1......
2 cases
  • Homes by Element Construction Ltd (Re), 2017 ABQB 442
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 13, 2017
    ...the proper approach to interpretation of the Act as set out in Master Mason’s reasons in Nexen Energy ULC v Pricewaterhousecoopers Inc, 2015 ABQB 271 (“Nexen”). In those reasons TRG is discussed as follows: [24] These doctrines should only be allowed to overcome a statutory temporal require......
  • Livello Project Inc v Ku, 2018 ABQB 418
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 25, 2018
    ...[17] This conclusion is consistent with the decision of Master Mason in Nexen Energy ULC v EDS Decommissioning Canada Inc. (Trustee of), 2015 ABQB 271, 2015 CarswellAlta 782 where she declined to reinstate liens which had been removed by the Registrar of Land Titles for failure to file a [1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT