Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeEpstein, Paciocco and Nordheimer JJ.A
Citation2018 ONCA 341
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC63468
Date09 April 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Sir Corp. v. Aviva,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...might hold”: Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65, at para. 94; Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341, 140 O.R. (3d) 401, at para. 18; Sattva, at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48, 212 D.L.R. (4th......
  • Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 12, 2021
    ...the “concerns” that an insurer alone might hold. This latter form of evidence is not admissible: Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para. 18; Sattva at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48 at para. [95] In this case, the affidavit o......
  • Paramount Resources Ltd v Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 8, 2023
    ...Ltd v Talisman Energy Inc, 2013 ABCA 40 at para 35) and regulatory regime ( Nexxtep at para 33; Nodel v Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para 55 - 124 While the surrounding circumstances are relied upon in the interpretive process, “courts cannot use them to deviate f......
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal – May 2018
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 29, 2018
    ...v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 (Epstein, Paciocco and Nordheimer JJ.A), April 9, In this case, a title insurer sought to avoid coverage for a mortgage fraud on the basis of a provision that excluded coverage for funds paid to any person other than the registered title hold......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Sir Corp. v. Aviva,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 20, 2022
    ...might hold”: Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65, at para. 94; Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341, 140 O.R. (3d) 401, at para. 18; Sattva, at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48, 212 D.L.R. (4th......
  • Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 12, 2021
    ...the “concerns” that an insurer alone might hold. This latter form of evidence is not admissible: Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para. 18; Sattva at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48 at para. [95] In this case, the affidavit o......
  • 0972672 B.C. Ltd. v. Standard Group Projects Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 17, 2022
    ...decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal that was brought to my attention by counsel for Investor. In Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., 2018 ONCA 341, the issue was the applicability of an exception in a mortgage fraud insurance policy that would allow the insurer to deny coverage in a si......
  • Serbinski v. FCT Insurance Company Ltd., 2018 ONSC 3029
    • Canada
    • Ontario Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 22, 2018
    ...policies are not in dispute. They are summarized at paras. 43-46 of Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2017 ONSC 890, aff’d, 2018 ONCA 341. The [17] The Policy provides that, subject to its exclusions, exceptions, conditions and stipulations, FCT has insured against “loss or damage” n......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal – May 2018
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 29, 2018
    ...v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 (Epstein, Paciocco and Nordheimer JJ.A), April 9, In this case, a title insurer sought to avoid coverage for a mortgage fraud on the basis of a provision that excluded coverage for funds paid to any person other than the registered title hold......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT