Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Epstein, Paciocco and Nordheimer JJ.A |
| Citation | 2018 ONCA 341 |
| Docket Number | C63468 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 09 April 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Sir Corp. v. Aviva,
...might hold”: Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65, at para. 94; Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341, 140 O.R. (3d) 401, at para. 18; Sattva, at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48, 212 D.L.R. (4th......
-
Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters,
...the “concerns” that an insurer alone might hold. This latter form of evidence is not admissible: Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para. 18; Sattva at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48 at para. [95] In this case, the affidavit o......
-
Paramount Resources Ltd v Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
...Ltd v Talisman Energy Inc, 2013 ABCA 40 at para 35) and regulatory regime ( Nexxtep at para 33; Nodel v Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para 55 - 124 While the surrounding circumstances are relied upon in the interpretive process, “courts cannot use them to deviate f......
-
Serbinski v. FCT Insurance Company Ltd.,
...policies are not in dispute. They are summarized at paras. 43-46 of Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2017 ONSC 890, aff’d, 2018 ONCA 341. The Policy [17] The Policy provides that, subject to its exclusions, exceptions, conditions and stipulations, FCT has insured against “loss or da......
Get Started for Free
6 cases
-
Sir Corp. v. Aviva,
...might hold”: Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters, 2021 BCCA 65, at para. 94; Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341, 140 O.R. (3d) 401, at para. 18; Sattva, at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48, 212 D.L.R. (4th......
-
Surespan Structures Ltd. v. Lloyds Underwriters,
...the “concerns” that an insurer alone might hold. This latter form of evidence is not admissible: Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para. 18; Sattva at paras. 59–61; Family Insurance Corp. v. Lombard Canada Ltd., 2002 SCC 48 at para. [95] In this case, the affidavit o......
-
Paramount Resources Ltd v Chubb Insurance Company of Canada,
...Ltd v Talisman Energy Inc, 2013 ABCA 40 at para 35) and regulatory regime ( Nexxtep at para 33; Nodel v Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 at para 55 - 124 While the surrounding circumstances are relied upon in the interpretive process, “courts cannot use them to deviate f......
-
Serbinski v. FCT Insurance Company Ltd.,
...policies are not in dispute. They are summarized at paras. 43-46 of Nodel v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2017 ONSC 890, aff’d, 2018 ONCA 341. The Policy [17] The Policy provides that, subject to its exclusions, exceptions, conditions and stipulations, FCT has insured against “loss or da......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Top 5 Civil Appeals From The Court Of Appeal May 2018
...v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, 2018 ONCA 341 (Epstein, Paciocco and Nordheimer JJ.A), April 9, In this case, a title insurer sought to avoid coverage for a mortgage fraud on the basis of a provision that excluded coverage for funds paid to any person other than the registered title hold......