Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456

JurisdictionAlberta
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo’Anne Strekaf,The Honourable Madam Justice Ritu Khullar
Date11 December 2020
Docket Number1801-0385-AC
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
Citation2020 ABCA 456
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 12 April 2024
    ...the proposed interpretation having regard to the legislative text: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 2. The Overarching Context and Purpose of the SafeRoads Regime 40 The twin purposes of the SafeRoa......
  • Cleanit Greenit Composting System Inc v Director (Alberta Environment and Parks), 2022 ABQB 582
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 August 2022
    ...has the jurisdiction granted to it by the provisions of the Act: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 67 [Normtek]. The Legislature has limited the decisions that can be appealed to those identified in s 91 of the Act and registrations a......
  • Morawetz v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 15 April 2024
    ...can defensibly or plausibly bear an interpretation that includes it: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 24; (e) the text of SAR section 4(e)(iv) does not reference demand unlawfulness or invalidity as......
  • Stopa v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 19 April 2024
    ...and plausible in light of the actual words used by the legislature: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 24; Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 213 at para 39; Morawetz at para 50 Adminis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 12 April 2024
    ...the proposed interpretation having regard to the legislative text: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 2. The Overarching Context and Purpose of the SafeRoads Regime 40 The twin purposes of the SafeRoa......
  • Cleanit Greenit Composting System Inc v Director (Alberta Environment and Parks), 2022 ABQB 582
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 August 2022
    ...has the jurisdiction granted to it by the provisions of the Act: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 67 [Normtek]. The Legislature has limited the decisions that can be appealed to those identified in s 91 of the Act and registrations a......
  • Morawetz v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 15 April 2024
    ...can defensibly or plausibly bear an interpretation that includes it: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 24; (e) the text of SAR section 4(e)(iv) does not reference demand unlawfulness or invalidity as......
  • Stopa v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads),
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 19 April 2024
    ...and plausible in light of the actual words used by the legislature: Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 at para 76; Gaca at para 44; Morin at para 24; Fish v Alberta (Director of SafeRoads), 2024 ABKB 213 at para 39; Morawetz at para 50 Adminis......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Energy Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 March 2021
    ...RADIATION SERVICES LTD V. ALBERTA ENVIRONMENTAL APPEAL BOARD, 2020 ABCA 456 Whether a party has standing before a tribunal is not commonly litigated, however, the question of standing can be of critical importance to parties appearing before administrative tribunals such as the Alberta Envi......
  • Canadian Energy Oil And Gas: Top 20 Of 2020 - Regulatory Decisions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 February 2021
    ...while Randall Block, QC and Jonathan Liteplo act for the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada in this proceeding. 4 2020 ABCA 456 5 Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act, RSA 200 c E-12 6 Para. 105 7 Para. 128 8 Alberta Energy Regulator's (AER) enforcement response About BLG......
  • Alberta Court Of Appeal Rules On The New "NORM" For Standing Before The Environmental Appeals Board
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 15 September 2022
    ...11, 2020, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 ("Normtek v EAB") where it overturned a Court of King's Bench judicial review ruling that upheld a decision by the Environmental Appeal Board (th......
  • Alberta Court Of Appeal Rules On The New "NORM" For Standing Before The Environmental Appeals Board
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 17 December 2020
    ...11, 2020, the Alberta Court of Appeal released its decision in Normtek Radiation Services Ltd v Alberta Environmental Appeal Board, 2020 ABCA 456 ("Normtek v EAB") where it overturned a Court of Queen's Bench judicial review ruling1 that upheld a decision by the Environmental Appeal Board (......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT