Norris v. Norris
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Renke |
| Judgment Date | 09 October 2024 |
| Citation | 2024 ABKB 600 |
| Docket Number | 2303 04657; ES03 165347 |
| Date | 09 October 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
PR Construction Ltd v. Colony Management Inc
...award of double costs, it must represent a genuine compromise, which is to be determined at the time the offer was made: Norris v Norris, 2024 ABKB 600 at para 108; Breen v Foremost Industries, 2024 ABKB 9 at para 37; Allen (Next Friend of) v University Hospitals Board, 2006 ABCA 101 at par......
-
Elliott v. Pierce
...not propose to address each example that Mr. Prenoslo raised. Rather, I will echo the comments of Justice Renke in Norris v Norris, 2024 ABKB 600 that “the overarching principle is proportionality” (para. 30). I will note as well that the examples cited of misconduct do not rise to th......
2 cases
-
PR Construction Ltd v. Colony Management Inc
...award of double costs, it must represent a genuine compromise, which is to be determined at the time the offer was made: Norris v Norris, 2024 ABKB 600 at para 108; Breen v Foremost Industries, 2024 ABKB 9 at para 37; Allen (Next Friend of) v University Hospitals Board, 2006 ABCA 101 at par......
-
Elliott v. Pierce
...not propose to address each example that Mr. Prenoslo raised. Rather, I will echo the comments of Justice Renke in Norris v Norris, 2024 ABKB 600 that “the overarching principle is proportionality” (para. 30). I will note as well that the examples cited of misconduct do not rise to th......
