Northern Regional Health Authority v. Horrocks,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Wagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Kasirer, Nicholas |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SCC 42 |
| Citation | 2021 SCC 42 |
| Date | 22 October 2021 |
| Docket Number | 37878 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 10
...SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559 at paras. 45-47). As recently stated by the Supreme Court in Northern Regional Health Authority v. Horrocks, 2021 SCC 42, [2021] 12 W.W.R. 1 (Horrocks), “[t]his approach accords no deference to the reviewing judge’s application of the standard of re......
-
Bangloy v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 245
...of review and, if so, applied it correctly. Recently, the Supreme Court of Canada in Northern Regional Health Authority v. Horrocks, 2021 SCC 42, declined the invitation to reconsider Agraira, and confirmed that its principles continue to apply. [33] Here, the Federal Court selected the app......
2 cases
-
Burlacu v. Canada (Attorney General), 2022 FCA 10
...SCC 36, [2013] 2 S.C.R. 559 at paras. 45-47). As recently stated by the Supreme Court in Northern Regional Health Authority v. Horrocks, 2021 SCC 42, [2021] 12 W.W.R. 1 (Horrocks), “[t]his approach accords no deference to the reviewing judge’s application of the standard of re......
-
Bangloy v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 245
...of review and, if so, applied it correctly. Recently, the Supreme Court of Canada in Northern Regional Health Authority v. Horrocks, 2021 SCC 42, declined the invitation to reconsider Agraira, and confirmed that its principles continue to apply. [33] Here, the Federal Court selected the app......