Oliver et al. v. Blais et al., [2015] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 35 (CA)
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
Judge | Steel, MacInnes and Burnett, JJ.A. |
Citation | [2015] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 35 (CA),2015 MBCA 99,[2015] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 35 |
Subject Matter | PRACTICE |
Date | 13 October 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Agricultural Law Netletter Aug 14th 2017
...BCSC 893 (CanLII), 39 ETR (2d) 233 (B.C.S.C.); Oliver v. Blais (November 21, 2014), Winnipeg PR10-01-84749, (Man. Q.B. Gen. Div.), aff'd 2015 MBCA 99 (CanII), leave to appeal ref'd [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 515 and Antrobus Antrobus, 2009 BCSC 1341 (CanLII), rev'd on quantum only, [2010] B.C.J. N......
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34
...unfounded allegations of fraud or dishonesty through trial: Topgro Greenhouses Ltd. et al v. Houweling, 2005 BCSC 180; Oliver v. Blais, 2015 MBCA 99. There are two aspects to the distinction: the claimant honestly believed the allegations were true; and she did not maintain the allegations ......
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M.,
...unfounded allegations of fraud or dishonesty through trial: Topgro Greenhouses Ltd. et al v. Houweling, 2005 BCSC 180; Oliver v. Blais, 2015 MBCA 99. There are two aspects to the distinction: the claimant honestly believed the allegations were true; and she did not maintain the allegations ......
-
Oliver et al. v. Blais et al., [2015] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 39 (CA)
...Court also found that the trial judge did not misunderstand or misapply the law and that he exercised his discretion appropriately (see 2015 MBCA 99, at para. 4). [6] The applicants apply for a rehearing on many grounds including: - that this Court was in error in finding that the trial jud......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34
...unfounded allegations of fraud or dishonesty through trial: Topgro Greenhouses Ltd. et al v. Houweling, 2005 BCSC 180; Oliver v. Blais, 2015 MBCA 99. There are two aspects to the distinction: the claimant honestly believed the allegations were true; and she did not maintain the allegations ......
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M.,
...unfounded allegations of fraud or dishonesty through trial: Topgro Greenhouses Ltd. et al v. Houweling, 2005 BCSC 180; Oliver v. Blais, 2015 MBCA 99. There are two aspects to the distinction: the claimant honestly believed the allegations were true; and she did not maintain the allegations ......
-
Oliver et al. v. Blais et al., [2015] Man.R.(2d) Uned. 39 (CA)
...Court also found that the trial judge did not misunderstand or misapply the law and that he exercised his discretion appropriately (see 2015 MBCA 99, at para. 4). [6] The applicants apply for a rehearing on many grounds including: - that this Court was in error in finding that the trial jud......
-
McDonald v. McDonald, 2017 BCCA 255
...v. Kreeft (2001), 39 ETR (2d) 233 (B.C.S.C.); Oliver v. Blais (November 21, 2014), Winnipeg PR10-01-84749, (Man. Q.B. Gen. Div.), aff’d 2015 MBCA 99, leave to appeal ref’d [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 515. They cite Antrobus v. Antrobus, 2009 BCSC 1341, rev’d on quantum only, 2010 BCCA 356, wherein ......
1 firm's commentaries
-
Agricultural Law Netletter Aug 14th 2017
...BCSC 893 (CanLII), 39 ETR (2d) 233 (B.C.S.C.); Oliver v. Blais (November 21, 2014), Winnipeg PR10-01-84749, (Man. Q.B. Gen. Div.), aff'd 2015 MBCA 99 (CanII), leave to appeal ref'd [2015] S.C.C.A. No. 515 and Antrobus Antrobus, 2009 BCSC 1341 (CanLII), rev'd on quantum only, [2010] B.C.J. N......