Olson v. Olson, 2016 ABQB 533
Judge | Renke, J. |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE |
Citation | 2016 ABQB 533 |
Date | 26 September 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...[2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC); TM v NO, [2005] Nu J No 22 (Ct J); Underhay v MacDonald, [2005] PEIJ No 78 (SC). Compare Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 92–95. 441 Keating v Keating, 2017 ABCA 428 at para 8; see also ZAM v AVT, 2018 ABQB 319. 442 See Phipps v Phipps, [2001] AJ No 1206 (QB); ......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...[2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC); TM v NO, [2005] Nu J No 22 (Ct J); Underhay v MacDonald, [2005] PEIJ No 78 (SC). Compare Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 92–95. As to whether the Alberta Court of Appeal should re-examine the criteria set out in the majority judgment in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt, see......
-
Child Support on or After Divorce
...Switzer v Switzer, 2018 ABQB 373; Normandin v Kovalench, [2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC). Compare Thomas v Thomas, 2014 ABQB 481; Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 92–95. 568 See also Demers v Moar, [2004] AJ No 1331 (CA); Blanchard v Blanchard, 2019 ABCA 53; AAA v KN, 2020 ABCA 141; Normandin ......
-
Child Support on or after Divorce
...Switzer v Switzer, 2018 ABQB 373; Normandin v Kovalench, [2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC). Compare Thomas v Thomas, 2014 ABQB 481; Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 534 See also Demers v Moar, [2004] AJ No 1331 (CA); Blanchard v Blanchard, 2019 ABCA 53; Normandin v Kovalench, [2007] NWTJ No 105 ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
AR v JU,
...have observed these fundamental changes in the Alberta economy and sights cases that have taken judicial notice of same. (Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 and Murray v Murray, 2021 ABQB 539). I do find it notable that at least in one of the cases provided the justice particularly refers to the ......
-
Sellers v Sellers, 2019 ABQB 969
...to his or her employment situation, are reasonable in the circumstances: Jean v Jean, 2006 ABQB 938 at para 113, and Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at para [115] Mrs. Sellers is seeking compensatory and non-compensatory spousal support for a duration of alm......
-
Evans v Nelson, 2017 ABPC 141
...3. Type of industry a. Energy sector - oilfield 4. Environment in which corporation operates a. As Justice Renke did in Olson v. Olson, 2016 ABQB 533, Court is prepared to take judicial notice of the plummeting oil price since 2015, and the ramifications for the oil and gas industry in Albe......
6 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Olson, [2003] AJ No 230, 320 AR 379, 36 RFL (5th) 196 (CA)................................................... 45, 46, 48 Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533...................................................................................................................................189 Olsze......
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...[2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC); TM v NO, [2005] Nu J No 22 (Ct J); Underhay v MacDonald, [2005] PEIJ No 78 (SC). Compare Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 92–95. As to whether the Alberta Court of Appeal should re-examine the criteria set out in the majority judgment in Hunt v Smolis-Hunt, see......
-
Determination of income; disclosure of income
...[2007] NWTJ No 105 (SC); TM v NO, [2005] Nu J No 22 (Ct J); Underhay v MacDonald, [2005] PEIJ No 78 (SC). Compare Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 at paras 92–95. 441 Keating v Keating, 2017 ABCA 428 at para 8; see also ZAM v AVT, 2018 ABQB 319. 442 See Phipps v Phipps, [2001] AJ No 1206 (QB); ......
-
Table of cases
...[2003] AJ No 230, 320 AR 379, 36 RFL (5th) 196 (CA) ......................................................... 45, 47 Olson v Olson, 2016 ABQB 533 .................................................................................................................................178 Olszewski v ......
Request a trial to view additional results