Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission

JurisdictionNova Scotia
CourtSupreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
JudgeJamieson
Citation2019 NSSC 223
Docket NumberHfx No. 482509
Date15 July 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Beals v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 14, 2020
    ...This is true whether the decision maker’s powers are narrowly or broadly drawn. In Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, 2019 NSSC 223, Jamieson J. considered whether Human Rights Officers under the Human Rights Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 214, have jurisdiction to screen potential com......
  • Olumide v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2019
    ...the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the decision of Justice Darlene Jamieson dated July 15, 2019. In that decision (reported as 2019 NSSC 223), Justice Jamieson declared Mr. Olumide to be a vexatious litigant and dismissed his claim for Judicial Review against the Nova Scotia Human ......
  • Peters (Estate) (Re)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...In Olumide v Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2019 NSSC 223 Justice Jamieson commented negatively on the practice of altering an affidavit without re-swearing it at para. 16, stating “… Clearly the affidavit was not re-sworn after the various revisions and additions were......
3 cases
  • Beals v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • February 14, 2020
    ...This is true whether the decision maker’s powers are narrowly or broadly drawn. In Olumide v. Nova Scotia Human Rights Commission, 2019 NSSC 223, Jamieson J. considered whether Human Rights Officers under the Human Rights Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 214, have jurisdiction to screen potential com......
  • Olumide v. Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • December 4, 2019
    ...the appellant filed a Notice of Appeal from the decision of Justice Darlene Jamieson dated July 15, 2019. In that decision (reported as 2019 NSSC 223), Justice Jamieson declared Mr. Olumide to be a vexatious litigant and dismissed his claim for Judicial Review against the Nova Scotia Human ......
  • Peters (Estate) (Re)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...In Olumide v Nova Scotia (Human Rights Commission), 2019 NSSC 223 Justice Jamieson commented negatively on the practice of altering an affidavit without re-swearing it at para. 16, stating “… Clearly the affidavit was not re-sworn after the various revisions and additions were......