Orsos v. Can. (M.C.I.), 2015 FC 248
Judge | Rennie, J. |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Case Date | February 26, 2015 |
Jurisdiction | Canada (Federal) |
Citations | 2015 FC 248;[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 118 (FC);[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 118 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Bito v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370
...In this context, I conclude that the principles set out by Justice Rennie (as he then was) in Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 FC 248 at para 18 apply, namely that where persecution is widespread and indiscriminate, as in Hungary, a failure to report mistreatment to the aut......
-
A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
...her evidentiary onus of rebutting the presumption of state protection (Lakatos at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach the state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively unreasonable ......
-
Marinaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 548
...of state protection (Lakatos v Canada (Immigration and Citizenship), 2018 FC 367 at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach his or her home state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively......
-
Brzezinski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 936
...a legal requirement. Rather, it goes to whether the claimant has met their evidentiary onus (Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para [23] In the context of the level of democracy and the evidentiary burden, as stated in Flores Carillo v Canada (Minister of Citizens......
4 cases
-
Bito v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370
...In this context, I conclude that the principles set out by Justice Rennie (as he then was) in Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 FC 248 at para 18 apply, namely that where persecution is widespread and indiscriminate, as in Hungary, a failure to report mistreatment to the aut......
-
A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
...her evidentiary onus of rebutting the presumption of state protection (Lakatos at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach the state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively unreasonable ......
-
Marinaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 548
...of state protection (Lakatos v Canada (Immigration and Citizenship), 2018 FC 367 at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach his or her home state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively......
-
Brzezinski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 936
...a legal requirement. Rather, it goes to whether the claimant has met their evidentiary onus (Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para [23] In the context of the level of democracy and the evidentiary burden, as stated in Flores Carillo v Canada (Minister of Citizens......