Orsos v. Can. (M.C.I.), 2015 FC 248

JudgeRennie, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateFebruary 26, 2015
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2015 FC 248;[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 118 (FC);[2015] F.T.R. Uned. 118
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Bito v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 3 Octubre 2022
    ...In this context, I conclude that the principles set out by Justice Rennie (as he then was) in Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 FC 248 at para 18 apply, namely that where persecution is widespread and indiscriminate, as in Hungary, a failure to report mistreatment to the aut......
  • A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Octubre 2019
    ...her evidentiary onus of rebutting the presumption of state protection (Lakatos at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach the state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively unreasonable ......
  • Marinaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 548
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Abril 2020
    ...of state protection (Lakatos v Canada (Immigration and Citizenship), 2018 FC 367 at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach his or her home state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively......
  • Brzezinski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 936
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 12 Julio 2023
    ...a legal requirement. Rather, it goes to whether the claimant has met their evidentiary onus (Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para [23] In the context of the level of democracy and the evidentiary burden, as stated in Flores Carillo v Canada (Minister of Citizens......
4 cases
  • Bito v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1370
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 3 Octubre 2022
    ...In this context, I conclude that the principles set out by Justice Rennie (as he then was) in Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 FC 248 at para 18 apply, namely that where persecution is widespread and indiscriminate, as in Hungary, a failure to report mistreatment to the aut......
  • A.B. v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1339
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Octubre 2019
    ...her evidentiary onus of rebutting the presumption of state protection (Lakatos at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach the state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively unreasonable ......
  • Marinaj v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 548
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Abril 2020
    ...of state protection (Lakatos v Canada (Immigration and Citizenship), 2018 FC 367 at para 20; Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para 18). Even so, a claimant’s failure to approach his or her home state for protection will defeat the claim only if it was objectively......
  • Brzezinski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 936
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 12 Julio 2023
    ...a legal requirement. Rather, it goes to whether the claimant has met their evidentiary onus (Orsos v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 248 at para [23] In the context of the level of democracy and the evidentiary burden, as stated in Flores Carillo v Canada (Minister of Citizens......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT