Ottenbreit v. Paul et al., 2014 Q.B.G. No. 2668

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeBarrington-Foote, J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Subject MatterADMINISTRATIVE LAW,COURTS,PRACTICE,LANDLORD AND TENANT
Date15 October 2015
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 practice notes
  • KNAPP and ATHERTON v. ICR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE and OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES, 2019 SKQB 59
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 26, 2019
    ...standard of review to be applied. Is it correctness or reasonableness? See, for example: Pelletier, at para 13, and Ottenbreit v Paul 2015 SKQB 326 at para 33 [Ottenbreit]. This determination is made by ascertaining the true nature of the ground of appeal under consideration. For example, i......
  • Digest: P.R. Investments Inc. v Amos, 2018 SKQB 127
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • April 27, 2018
    ...Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62, [2011] 3 SCR 708 Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326, 260 ACWS (3d) 363, 7 Admin LR (6th) 293 Pelletier v Harripersad, 2018 SKQB 33, 289 ACWS (3d) 193 P.R.I. Management v Amos, 2017 SKQB 342, 286......
  • P.R. INVESTMENTS INC. v. AMOS, 2018 SKQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 27, 2018
    ...been further clarification as to the proper approach to take on appeals from decisions of statutory tribunals. [18] In Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326 at para 33 [Ottenbreit], Barrington-Foote J. turned to more recent jurisprudence from the Supreme Court of Canada and concluded that it was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • KNAPP and ATHERTON v. ICR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE and OFFICE OF RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES, 2019 SKQB 59
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 26, 2019
    ...standard of review to be applied. Is it correctness or reasonableness? See, for example: Pelletier, at para 13, and Ottenbreit v Paul 2015 SKQB 326 at para 33 [Ottenbreit]. This determination is made by ascertaining the true nature of the ground of appeal under consideration. For example, i......
  • P.R. INVESTMENTS INC. v. AMOS, 2018 SKQB 127
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • April 27, 2018
    ...been further clarification as to the proper approach to take on appeals from decisions of statutory tribunals. [18] In Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326 at para 33 [Ottenbreit], Barrington-Foote J. turned to more recent jurisprudence from the Supreme Court of Canada and concluded that it was......
  • HART v. HUNCHAK, 2017 SKQB 354
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 30, 2017
    ...Court has followed the Dunsmuir standard of review analysis in several appeals from hearing officers under the Act: Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326; Copper Sands Land Corporation v Edwards, 2015 SKQB 402; Fecyk v Bracken, 2017 SKQB 85; Eastview Housing Association Ltd. v Gerard, 2016 SKQB ......
  • HART v. HUNCHAK,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 30, 2017
    ...Court has followed the Dunsmuir standard of review analysis in several appeals from hearing officers under the Act: Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326; Copper Sands Land Corporation v Edwards, 2015 SKQB 402; Fecyk v Bracken, 2017 SKQB 85; Eastview Housing Association Ltd. v Gerard, 2016 SKQB ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Digest: P.R. Investments Inc. v Amos, 2018 SKQB 127
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • April 27, 2018
    ...Newfoundland and Labrador Nurses' Union v Newfoundland and Labrador (Treasury Board), 2011 SCC 62, [2011] 3 SCR 708 Ottenbreit v Paul, 2015 SKQB 326, 260 ACWS (3d) 363, 7 Admin LR (6th) 293 Pelletier v Harripersad, 2018 SKQB 33, 289 ACWS (3d) 193 P.R.I. Management v Amos, 2017 SKQB 342, 286......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT