P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson, Ottenbreit and Schwann JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 111 |
| Date | 31 October 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3183 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...at para 26; Strecko v Strecko, 2014 NSCA 66; Fisher v Fisher, 2008 ONCA 11; Verkaik v Verkaik, 2020 ONSC 7993 (child support); PM v SM, 2019 SKCA 111 at para 39. See also Evans v Spicer, 2014 NSSC 140 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Bennett v Bennett, 2021 BCSC 1631. 247 248 Canadian family......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...v Beck, 2012 NLTD(F) 34; Hill v Hill, 2003 NSCA 33 at para 26; Strecko v Strecko, 2014 NSCA 66; Fisher v Fisher, 2008 ONCA 11; PM v SM, 2019 SKCA 111 at para 39. See also Evans v Spicer, 2014 NSSC 138 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502. 241 242 Canadian family law within the time set for review......
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...and the fixing of the quantum of spousal support: D.B.B., Walker v Walker, 2019 SKCA 96, 31 RFL (8th) 310 [Walker], and P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111, 34 RFL (8th) 34. 2. Mr. Dungey’s income [66] There was no dispute at trial, or on appeal, that Ms. Dungey is entitled to spousal support for an......
-
M.H. v A.B., 2019 SKCA 135
...a significant misapprehension of the evidence, or unless the award is clearly wrong: Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518; P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111; Schimelfenig v Schimelfenig, 2014 SKCA 77, 442 Sask R 30; D.B.B. v D.M.B., 2017 SKCA 59; Bergquist v Bergquist, 2014 SKCA 20, 433 Sask R A. The......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
M.H. v A.B., 2019 SKCA 135
...a significant misapprehension of the evidence, or unless the award is clearly wrong: Hickey v Hickey, [1999] 2 SCR 518; P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111; Schimelfenig v Schimelfenig, 2014 SKCA 77, 442 Sask R 30; D.B.B. v D.M.B., 2017 SKCA 59; Bergquist v Bergquist, 2014 SKCA 20, 433 Sask R A. The......
-
Dungey v Dungey,
...and the fixing of the quantum of spousal support: D.B.B., Walker v Walker, 2019 SKCA 96, 31 RFL (8th) 310 [Walker], and P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111, 34 RFL (8th) 34. 2. Mr. Dungey’s income [66] There was no dispute at trial, or on appeal, that Ms. Dungey is entitled to spousal support for an......
-
J.A.K. v. C.Q.W., 2021 SKQB 272
...is obsolete and an adjustment is required in light of the totality of circumstances, as well as the evidence of change. See P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111 at paras 119‑22, 34 RFL (8th) 34; Seymour v Seymour, 2015 SKQB 239 at paras 20‑21, 65 RFL (7th) 93; and Kletzel v Kletzel, 200......
-
Boutin v Boutin,
...dipping” or “double recovery” despite that Mr. Boutin's pension had been divided equally, citing P.M. v S.M., 2019 SKCA 111, 34 RFL (8th) 16 On this basis, Ms. Boutin contended that her income should be found to be $51,064.00, that Mr. Boutin's should be $266,......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...at para 26; Strecko v Strecko, 2014 NSCA 66; Fisher v Fisher, 2008 ONCA 11; Verkaik v Verkaik, 2020 ONSC 7993 (child support); PM v SM, 2019 SKCA 111 at para 39. See also Evans v Spicer, 2014 NSSC 140 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502; Bennett v Bennett, 2021 BCSC 1631. 247 248 Canadian family......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...v Beck, 2012 NLTD(F) 34; Hill v Hill, 2003 NSCA 33 at para 26; Strecko v Strecko, 2014 NSCA 66; Fisher v Fisher, 2008 ONCA 11; PM v SM, 2019 SKCA 111 at para 39. See also Evans v Spicer, 2014 NSSC 138 Tedham v Tedham, 2005 BCCA 502. 241 242 Canadian family law within the time set for review......