A.P. v J.P., 2020 SKCA 134
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Jackson, Schwann and Tholl JJ.A. |
| Docket Number | CACV3233 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 04 December 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...248 Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 at paras 26–27. 249 2018 ONSC 2542 at paras 9–13; see also Green v Whyte, 2019 ONSC 7133; AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134. Compare the conservative approach in Alberta to awarding costs to self-represented litigants: see Lawson v Lawson, 2020 ABQB Child Support ......
-
Table of Cases
...Sask R 314 (QB)...............................................................202 654 Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134....................................................................................................................................................
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...ONCA 495. 130 2010 BCCA 55 at para 26. See also Kennedy v Peters-Kennedy, 2017 ONSC 7296; Wolfram v Gordon, 2019 SKQB 202. 131 AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134 at para 38 (Skype 132 See VSG v LJG, [2004] OJ No 2238 at para 128 in text below. And see Young v Young, [1994] 4 SCR 3 (McLachlin J); Renson......
-
S.W.B.M. v C.S.M.,
...parent’s ability to spend time or communicate with their children is an extraordinary remedy that must not be lightly made: A.P. v J.P., 2020 SKCA 134 at para 38, 48 RFL (8th) 298 [A.P.]. However, in these circumstances, the order was supported by the evidence and well within the trial judg......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
S.W.B.M. v C.S.M.,
...parent’s ability to spend time or communicate with their children is an extraordinary remedy that must not be lightly made: A.P. v J.P., 2020 SKCA 134 at para 38, 48 RFL (8th) 298 [A.P.]. However, in these circumstances, the order was supported by the evidence and well within the trial judg......
-
CMB v AMB,
...375; Crawford v Crawford, 2015 ABCA 376 at para 15, 68 RFL (7th) 1; M(A) v H(C), 2019 ONCA 764 at para 4, 32 RFL (8th) 1; P(A) v P(J), 2020 SKCA 134 at para 36, 48 RFL (8th) 298; M(J) v M(E), 2022 ABCA 49 at para 26, 468 DLR (4th) [19] &#x......
-
K.D. v. C.K.,
...her actions in limiting his parenting time, or outright denying it on occasion, amount to parental alienation and relies on A.P. v. J.P, 2020 SKCA 134 [A.P.] to suggest a major change in the parenting arrangements are justified. I am not convinced on the evidence before me that K.D. has qui......
-
NUNWEILER v. NUNWEILER,
...In A.P. v J.P., 2020 SKCA 134, 48 RFL (8th) 298, the Court of Appeal recognized that the presumption might be rebutted in circumstances where financial disadvantage created by a cost award could have a bearing on the child’s best interests. The Court instructed: &#x......
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Sask R 314 (QB)...............................................................202 654 Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2022 AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134....................................................................................................................................................
-
Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
...ONCA 495. 130 2010 BCCA 55 at para 26. See also Kennedy v Peters-Kennedy, 2017 ONSC 7296; Wolfram v Gordon, 2019 SKQB 202. 131 AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134 at para 38 (Skype 132 See VSG v LJG, [2004] OJ No 2238 at para 128 in text below. And see Young v Young, [1994] 4 SCR 3 (McLachlin J); Renson......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...248 Banilevic v Cairney, 2020 SKQB 25 at paras 26–27. 249 2018 ONSC 2542 at paras 9–13; see also Green v Whyte, 2019 ONSC 7133; AP v JP, 2020 SKCA 134. Compare the conservative approach in Alberta to awarding costs to self-represented litigants: see Lawson v Lawson, 2020 ABQB Child Support ......