Paddayuman v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 287
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 287 |
| Date | 08 March 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Iriekpen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Ndayinase, 2016 FC 694 at paras 27–28; Paddayuman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 287 at paras 28–32; San Juan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 434 at paras 10–17. [22] In the present case, given the ......
-
Ntamag v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 40
...reasons, especially given that the GCMS Notes are considered as part of those reasons (Paddayuman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 287 at para 13; Song v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 72 at para 18). In addition, the Supreme Court in Vavilov states that, in ac......
2 cases
-
Iriekpen v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v Ndayinase, 2016 FC 694 at paras 27–28; Paddayuman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 287 at paras 28–32; San Juan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 434 at paras 10–17. [22] In the present case, given the ......
-
Ntamag v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2020 FC 40
...reasons, especially given that the GCMS Notes are considered as part of those reasons (Paddayuman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 287 at para 13; Song v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 72 at para 18). In addition, the Supreme Court in Vavilov states that, in ac......