Pakage Apparel Inc. et al. v. Ellis et al.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Fenlon, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 884,2014 BCSC 884,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 884 (SC) |
| Date | 17 April 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al.,
...J. held that there was a serious question "to be tried as to whether the emails were improperly taken": Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis , 2014 BCSC 884 at para 43. [47] The Chambers judge held (at para 76) that the KE Parties' conduct could "not be condoned", and that the misconduct of Mr. Ell......
-
Natural Trade Ltd. v. MYL Trading Ltd.,
...for the granting of an interlocutory injunction: Laxton v. Coglon, 2006 BCSC 181 aff’d 2006 BCCA 178 and Package Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 at para. 40. If granted, will the interlocutory injunction sought by the plaintiffs effectively amount to a final order? [39] The plaintiffs ......
-
2024 BCSC 841,
...in SR Télécom & Co., S.E.C. v. Apex – Micro Manufacturing Corp., 2008 BCSC 1768 [ SR Télécom], and in Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 [ Pakage Cascade's Position 68 Cascade's primary position is that the applicable test under R. 10-1(4) is the four-part test set out in Teras......
-
Viking Air Ltd v Cascade Aerospace Inc.,
...in SR Télécom & Co., S.E.C. v. Apex – Micro Manufacturing Corp., 2008 BCSC 1768 [ SR Télécom], and in Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 [ Pakage Cascade's Position 68 Cascade's primary position is that the applicable test under R. 10-1(4) is the four-part test set out in Teras......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
No Limits Sportswear Inc. v. 0912139 B.C. Ltd. et al.
...J. held that there was a serious question "to be tried as to whether the emails were improperly taken": Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis , 2014 BCSC 884 at para 43. [47] The Chambers judge held (at para 76) that the KE Parties' conduct could "not be condoned", and that the misconduct of Mr. Ell......
-
Natural Trade Ltd. v. MYL Trading Ltd.
...for the granting of an interlocutory injunction: Laxton v. Coglon, 2006 BCSC 181 aff’d 2006 BCCA 178 and Package Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 at para. 40. If granted, will the interlocutory injunction sought by the plaintiffs effectively amount to a final order? [39] The plaintiffs ......
-
2024 BCSC 841
...in SR Télécom & Co., S.E.C. v. Apex – Micro Manufacturing Corp., 2008 BCSC 1768 [ SR Télécom], and in Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 [ Pakage Cascade's Position 68 Cascade's primary position is that the applicable test under R. 10-1(4) is the four-part test set out in Teras......
-
Viking Air Ltd v Cascade Aerospace Inc.
...in SR Télécom & Co., S.E.C. v. Apex – Micro Manufacturing Corp., 2008 BCSC 1768 [ SR Télécom], and in Pakage Apparel Inc. v. Ellis, 2014 BCSC 884 [ Pakage Cascade's Position 68 Cascade's primary position is that the applicable test under R. 10-1(4) is the four-part test set out in Teras......
Get Started for Free