Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 SCR 759

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLaskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Pigeon, Louis-Philippe; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; Pratte, Yves; McIntyre, William Rogers
Date21 December 1979
Citation[1980] 1 SCR 759,106 DLR (3d) 212,50 CCC (2d) 193,[1979] CarswellBC 533,[1979] ACS no 126,[1979] SCJ No 126 (QL),30 NR 181,1979 CanLII 188 (SCC),14 CR (3d) 22,4 WCB 171,[1980] 1 SCR 783,1979 CanLII 8 (SCC)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2508 practice notes
  • R. v. Worm (J.) et al., 2014 SKCA 94
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 15 Septiembre 2014
    ...R. v. Smith (S.A.) (2007), 299 Sask.R. 312; 408 W.A.C. 312; 223 C.C.C.(3d) 114; 2007 SKCA 71, refd to. [para. 110]. R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; 30 N.R. 181, refd to. [para. R. v. Wenarchuk (1982), 15 Sask.R. 240; 67 C.C.C.(2d) 169 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 125]. R. v. Gladue (J.T.), [1......
  • R. v. Warsing, [1998] 3 SCR 579
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 1998
    ...3 S.C.R. 620 ; R. v. Barnes, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 449 ; Guillemette v. The Queen, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 356 ; considered: Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Mailloux, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 1029 ; R. v. Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933 ; referred to: R. v. Buxbaum (1989), 70 C.R. (3d) 20 ; McMart......
  • R. v. Dixon (S.), (1997) 156 N.S.R.(2d) 81 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Nova Scotia Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 15 Enero 1997
    ...for the admission of fresh evidence, as set out in Palmer and Palmer v. The Queen (1979), 50 C.C.C.(2d) 193; 106 D.L.R.(3d) 212; [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, and R. v. Stolar (1988), 40 C.C.C.(3d) 1; [1988] 1 S.C.R. 480; 62 C.R.(3d) 313, do not determine whether the tendered fresh evidence should b......
  • May v. Ferndale Institution, 2005 SCC 82
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2005
    ..., 2001 SCC 35 ; Nicholson v. Haldimand‑Norfolk Regional Board of Commissioners of Police, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 311 ; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; United States of America v. Shulman, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616 , 2001 SCC 21 ; Public School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney ......
  • Get Started for Free
2276 cases
  • May et al. v. Ferndale Institution et al., (2005) 220 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 22 Diciembre 2005
    ...Board of Commissioners of Police and Ontario (Attorney General), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 311; 23 N.R. 410, refd to. [para. 94]. R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; 30 N.R. 181, refd to. [paras. 107, 133]. United States of America v. Shulman, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 616; 268 N.R. 115; 145 O.A.C. 201; 2001 SC......
  • Victoria (City) v. Adams et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 9 Diciembre 2009
    ...27, refd to. [para. 35]. Gosselin v. Québec (Procureur général) (2002), 298 N.R. 1; 2002 SCC 84, refd to. [para. 44]. R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; 30 N.R. 181; 106 D.L.R.(3d) 212, refd to. [para. Reference Re Constitutional Question Act (B.C.), [1991] 2 S.C.R. 525; 127 N.R. 161; 1 B.C......
  • R. v. Mahalingan,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 14 Noviembre 2008
    ...(K.R.) (1991), 68 C.C.C. (3d) 268 ; R. v. Verney (1993), 87 C.C.C. (3d) 363 ; R. v. Ollis, [1900] 2 Q.B. 758 ; Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; R. v. Handy, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 908 , 2002 SCC 56 ; R. v. B. (L.) (1997), 9 C.R. (5th) 38 ; R. v. Kirk (2004), 188 C.C.C. (3d) 329 ; R......
  • R. v. Hay,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 8 Noviembre 2013
    ...the jury that it could convict the appellant on the evidence of L.M. alone. Cases Cited By Rothstein J. Applied: Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759; referred to: R. v. Hay, 2010 SCC 54, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 206; R. v. Mezzo, [1986] 1 S.C.R. 802; R. v. Turnbull, [1976] 3 All E.R. 549; R. v.......
  • Get Started for Free
82 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 27 ' October 1)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 5 Octubre 2021
    ...Hickey v. Hickey, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 518 , Van de Perre v. Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 , R.F. v. J.W., 2021 ONCA 528 , Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, Goldman v. Kudelya, 2017 ONCA 300 Ottawa-Carleton Standard Condominium Corporation No.671 v. Friend, 2021 ONCA 666 Keywords: Real Pro......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 20 ' 24, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 27 Junio 2022
    ...5, R. v. Smith, 2015 SCC 34, New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G. (J.), [1999] 3 S.C.R. 46, R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, Public School Boards' Association of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), [2000] 1 S.C.R. 44, R. v. Powley (2001), 53 O.R. (3d) 35 (C.A......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 3 ' 6, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 24 Abril 2023
    ...Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, No Genuine Issue Requiring Trial, Rules of Civil Procedure, r. 20.04(2)(a), Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, Hyrniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, Sweda Farms Ltd. v. Egg Farmers of Ontario, 2014 ONCA 878, Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, Sattva Capit......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 23 ' 27, 2023)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 31 Enero 2023
    ...Gregory v. Jolley (2001), 54 O.R. (3d) 481 (C.A.), Sagl v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2009 ONCA 388 , Palmer v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, F.(K.) v. White (2001), 53 O.R. (3d) 391 (C.A.), Andreadis v. Pinto (2009), 98 O.R. (3d) 701 (S.C.J.), Bruno Appliance and Furniture......
  • Get Started for Free
167 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The Law of Evidence. Seventh Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2015
    ...477, 144 A.L.R. 719 (1943) ............................................................................ 182– 83, Palmer v. R. (1979), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, 50 C.C.C. 193, 14 C.R. (3d) 22 ............................................................................................. 47 3 Park v......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Criminal Procedure. Third Edition
    • 29 Agosto 2016
    ...R v Owen, [2003] 1 SCR 779, 174 CCC (3d) 1, 2003 SCC 33 .............................171 R v Palmer (1979), [1980] 1 SCR 759, 50 CCC (2d) 193, [1979] SCJ No 126 .......................................................................462, 463, 464 R v Pan; R v Sawyer, [2001] 2 SCR 344, 155 CC......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Criminal Appeals: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • 2 Mayo 2017
    ...18 O’Connor, R v , 2002 CanLII 3540, 170 CCC (3d) 365 (Ont CA) ..................... 42 Palmer, R v , [1980] 1 SCR 759 ..................................... 82, 84, 85, 87, 88 Parrington, R v (1985), 20 CCC (3d) 184 (Ont CA) ................................ 43 Patriquin, R v , 2003 NSCA 89 ......
  • Application for Judicial Review
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Extradition Cases: A Practitioner's Handbook
    • 2 Mayo 2017
    ...to in subsection (1). 12 United States of America v Kwok , 2001 SCC 18 at para 79, [2001] 1 SCR 532, citing Palmer v The Queen , [1980] 1 SCR 759 . 13 See e.g. United States of America v Shulman , 2001 SCC 21 at paras 44-48, [2001] 1 SCR 616 . See also United States of America v Walker , 20......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT