Paragon Development Corp. et al. v. Kaiser Estate et al.

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeWeiler, Watt and Karakatsanis, JJ.A.
Citation[2011] O.A.C. Uned. 18,2011 ONCA 30,[2011] O.A.C. Uned. 18 (CA)
Date17 January 2011
Subject MatterPRACTICE,EQUITY,LIMITATION OF ACTIONS,TRUSTS,COMPANY LAW

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 28, 2025
    ...Trident Holdings Ltd. v. Danand Investments Ltd. (1988), 64 O.R. (2d) 65 (C.A.), Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30, Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 274 Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company,2025 ONCA 719 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Class Pr......
  • Skylark v. Minhas
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 27, 2017
    ...[21] Csak v. Aumon, 1990 ONSC 8070 (CanLII), at paras. 7 and 8 [22] Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30 (CanLII), at paras. 3 to 4 [23] Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24 [24] Solosky v. R. (1979), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821, [1979] S.C.J. No.......
  • Active Customs Brokers v. Shapero et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 24, 2020
    ...2020 [1] Knight v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 S.C.C. 42 at para 17. [2] Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30 at para 10. [3] [2011] O.J. No. 2425 (ONSC) [4] (Toronto: Carswell, 2004) at 57. [5] 2016 ONCA 287. [6] See Waxman v. Waxman (2004), 186 O.A......
  • FIC Real Estate Fund Ltd. v. Phoenix Land Ventures Ltd., 2015 ABQB 318
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 20, 2015
    ...has no independent power, discretion or responsibility in connection with the property: Paragon Development Corp v Sonka Properties Inc , 2011 ONCA 30, [2011] OJ No 127 at para 6. [100] In LAC Minerals Ltd v International Corona Resources Ltd , [1989] 2 SCR 574, 61 DLR (4th) 14 at 63, the C......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Skylark v. Minhas
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 27, 2017
    ...[21] Csak v. Aumon, 1990 ONSC 8070 (CanLII), at paras. 7 and 8 [22] Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30 (CanLII), at paras. 3 to 4 [23] Limitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24 [24] Solosky v. R. (1979), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821, [1979] S.C.J. No.......
  • Active Customs Brokers v. Shapero et al.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 24, 2020
    ...2020 [1] Knight v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 S.C.C. 42 at para 17. [2] Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30 at para 10. [3] [2011] O.J. No. 2425 (ONSC) [4] (Toronto: Carswell, 2004) at 57. [5] 2016 ONCA 287. [6] See Waxman v. Waxman (2004), 186 O.A......
  • FIC Real Estate Fund Ltd. v. Phoenix Land Ventures Ltd., 2015 ABQB 318
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 20, 2015
    ...has no independent power, discretion or responsibility in connection with the property: Paragon Development Corp v Sonka Properties Inc , 2011 ONCA 30, [2011] OJ No 127 at para 6. [100] In LAC Minerals Ltd v International Corona Resources Ltd , [1989] 2 SCR 574, 61 DLR (4th) 14 at 63, the C......
  • Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario v First Swiss Mortgage Corporation
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 23, 2025
    ...Ltd. v. Danand Investments Ltd. (1988), 64 O.R. (2d) 65 (C.A.), at p. 75; Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30, 103 O.R. (3d) 481, at para. 6, leave to appeal refused, [2011] S.C.C.A. No. 103. Because Olympia had no independent power to administer the mortg......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 28, 2025
    ...Trident Holdings Ltd. v. Danand Investments Ltd. (1988), 64 O.R. (2d) 65 (C.A.), Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30, Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 274 Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company,2025 ONCA 719 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Class Pr......
  • Rescission Under The Ontario Arthur Wishart Act: Quantifying The Remedy
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 9, 2015
    ...Inc., 1994 CanLII 3427 (PEI SC TD). See Paragon Development Corp. v Sonka Properties Inc. (2009), 96 OR (3d) 574, 2009 CanLII 13627; aff;d 2011 ONCA 30, 103 OR (3d) 481; leave to appeal to SCC dismissed in 2011 CanLII [219] The Court has the discretion to award interest at a rate in excess ......