Parliament et al v. Conley and Park
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | S.J. WOODLEY |
| Date | 14 May 2019 |
| Docket Number | 79524/12 |
| Citation | 2019 ONSC 2951 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
Badar v Danish,
...that the law does not permit to be considered is inadmissible, even if it is relevant and material: Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951, at para. 17. Hearsay evidence is presumptively inadmissible. Absent the consent of the parties, hearsay can only be admitted under a statu......
-
Alison Braks v. Dundeal Canada (GP) Inc.,
...that the law does not permit to be considered is inadmissible, even if it is relevant and material: Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951 (CanLII), at para. 17 [Parliament]. [53] *7/Hearsay evidence is presumptively i......
-
R v Lam,
...Lederman & Bryant: The Law of Evidence in Canada, 6th ed. (Toronto: LexisNexis, 2022). d. In Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951, Woodley J. noted that in addition to any common law exception, business records which include medical records, are expressly admissible pursu......
5 cases
-
Badar v Danish
...that the law does not permit to be considered is inadmissible, even if it is relevant and material: Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951, at para. 17. Hearsay evidence is presumptively inadmissible. Absent the consent of the parties, hearsay can only be admitted under a statu......
-
Alison Braks v. Dundeal Canada (GP) Inc.
...that the law does not permit to be considered is inadmissible, even if it is relevant and material: Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951 (CanLII), at para. 17 [Parliament]. [53] *7/Hearsay evidence is presumptively i......
-
2025 ONCA 851
...“may be shown to affect its weight, but such circumstances do not affect its admissibility”: see Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951, at paras. 33–36; and L. (B.) v. Saskatchewan (Ministry of Social Services), 2012 SKCA 38, 393 Sask. R. 57, at paras. 26–29, respecting s. 50(......
-
Gumbley v Vasiliou
...“may be shown to affect its weight, but such circumstances do not affect its admissibility”: see Parliament et al v. Conley and Park, 2019 ONSC 2951, at paras. 33–36; and L. (B.) v. Saskatchewan (Ministry of Social Services), 2012 SKCA 38, 393 Sask. R. 57, at paras. 26–29, respecting s. 50(......
Get Started for Free