Patel v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77

CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 20, 2020
JurisdictionCanada (Federal)
Citations2020 FC 77
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
61 practice notes
  • Pandher v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 687
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 10 d2 Maio d2 2022
    ...was certainly entitled to give brief reasons when deciding the study permit visa application (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 [Patel] at paras 15, 17; Yuzer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 781 at para 9; as long as those reasons are “respons......
  • Roodsari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 970
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 19 d3 Julho d3 2023
    ...[Ocran] at para 15; Afuah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 596 at paras 9-10; Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at para 17, cited with approval in Motlagh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1098 at para [Italic original] [13] Further, ......
  • Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 102
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 d1 Janeiro d1 2024
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Khan, 2001 FCA 345 at para 32; and Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at paras 15, 17. Given this context and the nature of a visa application and refusal, the Court has recognized that the requirements of fairness, an......
  • Vahora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 778
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 d5 Maio d5 2022
    ...for timely processing, it is understood that the reasons are necessarily and usually brief (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at paras 15 and 17 [Patel]); nonetheless, the reasons must permit the Court to understand why the application was refused and to determine tha......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
64 cases
  • Pandher v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 687
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 10 d2 Maio d2 2022
    ...was certainly entitled to give brief reasons when deciding the study permit visa application (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 [Patel] at paras 15, 17; Yuzer v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 781 at para 9; as long as those reasons are “respons......
  • Roodsari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 970
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 19 d3 Julho d3 2023
    ...[Ocran] at para 15; Afuah v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 596 at paras 9-10; Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at para 17, cited with approval in Motlagh v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1098 at para [Italic original] [13] Further, ......
  • Vahora v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 778
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 27 d5 Maio d5 2022
    ...for timely processing, it is understood that the reasons are necessarily and usually brief (Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at paras 15 and 17 [Patel]); nonetheless, the reasons must permit the Court to understand why the application was refused and to determine tha......
  • Khan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2024 FC 102
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 d1 Janeiro d1 2024
    ...Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v Khan, 2001 FCA 345 at para 32; and Patel v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 77 at paras 15, 17. Given this context and the nature of a visa application and refusal, the Court has recognized that the requirements of fairness, an......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT