Pazmandi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 27 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Campos Sandoval v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1000
...credibility: Luo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 823 at paras 19-21; Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at paras 25-26. [35] The following two-part test for determining when a decision-maker can require corroborative evidence was proposed in Senadh......
-
Kim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1408
...done as of the date of decision, the date of the hearing or “today”: see eg Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094, at para 38, quoting Mileva v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1991] 3 FC 398 (FCA); Barrios Trigoso v Canada (Citizenship......
-
Lozano Caceres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 179
...is an exception to the cessation provisions in the IRPA, which take away refugee status (Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at para 46; Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Obstoj, [1992] 2 FC 739 (CA) at paras 13-14, 93 DLR (4th) 144). For section 10......
-
Abu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 258
...and that is a pre-condition to the consideration of the compelling reasons exception (see Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at paras 46-51). [14] The Applicants also submit that the RAD’s decision is unreasonable because of the inconsistent findings regard......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Campos Sandoval v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1000
...credibility: Luo v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 823 at paras 19-21; Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at paras 25-26. [35] The following two-part test for determining when a decision-maker can require corroborative evidence was proposed in Senadh......
-
Lozano Caceres v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 179
...is an exception to the cessation provisions in the IRPA, which take away refugee status (Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at para 46; Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) v Obstoj, [1992] 2 FC 739 (CA) at paras 13-14, 93 DLR (4th) 144). For section 10......
-
Kim v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1408
...done as of the date of decision, the date of the hearing or “today”: see eg Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094, at para 38, quoting Mileva v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1991] 3 FC 398 (FCA); Barrios Trigoso v Canada (Citizenship......
-
Abu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 258
...and that is a pre-condition to the consideration of the compelling reasons exception (see Pazmandi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 1094 at paras 46-51). [14] The Applicants also submit that the RAD’s decision is unreasonable because of the inconsistent findings regard......
Request a trial to view additional results