Penez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 1001 |
| Date | 06 November 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
90 practice notes
-
Haghshenas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...the form and the letter, as well as the GCMS notes prepared for the case. [Emphasis added] [15] More generally, in Penez v Canada (MCI), 2017 FC 1001 at paragraph 37 my colleague Gascon J. held: [37] Visa officers are therefore generally not required to provide applicants with opportunities......
-
Salkhan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...of concerns relating to whether the requirements set out in the legislation have been met (Penez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001 at paras [43] In sum, I cannot find any breach of procedural fairness in the process followed by the Officer. IV. Conclusion [44] For all of ......
-
Ebrahimshani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...decision, an obligation that has been expressly rejected by this Court on many occasions (Penez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001 at para 37; Tofangchi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 427 at para 45; Ahmed v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)......
-
Jamali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...the IRPR: see e.g., Masam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 751, at para 11; Penez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001, at para 37; Sulce, at paras 10-11, 16. [50] It may be procedurally unfair not to seek more information from an applicant if such concerns ......
Get Started for Free
62 cases
-
Haghshenas v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...the form and the letter, as well as the GCMS notes prepared for the case. [Emphasis added] [15] More generally, in Penez v Canada (MCI), 2017 FC 1001 at paragraph 37 my colleague Gascon J. held: [37] Visa officers are therefore generally not required to provide applicants with opportunities......
-
Salkhan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...of concerns relating to whether the requirements set out in the legislation have been met (Penez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001 at paras [43] In sum, I cannot find any breach of procedural fairness in the process followed by the Officer. IV. Conclusion [44] For all of ......
-
Ebrahimshani v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...decision, an obligation that has been expressly rejected by this Court on many occasions (Penez v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001 at para 37; Tofangchi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 427 at para 45; Ahmed v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)......
-
Jamali v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...the IRPR: see e.g., Masam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 751, at para 11; Penez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1001, at para 37; Sulce, at paras 10-11, 16. [50] It may be procedurally unfair not to seek more information from an applicant if such concerns ......
Get Started for Free
