Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Judge | MAINELLA JA |
| Citation | 2020 MBCA 97 |
| Docket Number | AI20-30-09422 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Manitoba) |
| Date | 06 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Interlake Reserves Tribal Council Inc et al, v The Government of Manitoba,
...hearing date (see r 43.1(2)). [5] The criteria for an extension of time are not in dispute (see Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97 at paras 10-11). This is not a case where the “sin” of counsel should be visited on his client. The MMF had a continuous intention to interven......
-
Bartel-Zobarich v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals (MAHCP-Bargaining Unit) et al,
...In Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97, Mainella JA explained that, before a preliminary examination of whether a ground is arguable can take place, discernable grounds of appeal must be identified. He said (at para 15): Rule 4 of the CA Rules sets out the requisite c......
-
Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality),
...The judge issued reasons which provide considerable detail about the background of the matter (see Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97) (CA Decision No. 1). With respect to Mr. Penner’s explanation for the delay, the judge accepted that “the COVID-1......
3 cases
-
Interlake Reserves Tribal Council Inc et al, v The Government of Manitoba,
...hearing date (see r 43.1(2)). [5] The criteria for an extension of time are not in dispute (see Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97 at paras 10-11). This is not a case where the “sin” of counsel should be visited on his client. The MMF had a continuous intention to interven......
-
Bartel-Zobarich v Manitoba Association of Health Care Professionals (MAHCP-Bargaining Unit) et al,
...In Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97, Mainella JA explained that, before a preliminary examination of whether a ground is arguable can take place, discernable grounds of appeal must be identified. He said (at para 15): Rule 4 of the CA Rules sets out the requisite c......
-
Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality),
...The judge issued reasons which provide considerable detail about the background of the matter (see Penner v Montcalm (Rural Municipality), 2020 MBCA 97) (CA Decision No. 1). With respect to Mr. Penner’s explanation for the delay, the judge accepted that “the COVID-1......