PENNINGTON v R., 2019 SKQB 319

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeTOCHOR J.
Citation2019 SKQB 319
Docket NumberCRM 28 of 2018
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date10 December 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • PENNINGTON v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2020 SKQB 198
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 4, 2020
    ...and remitting the Direct Indictment back to the pre-trial conference judge. [16] Later, on December 10, 2019, a formal ruling reported at 2019 SKQB 319 was released which stayed proceedings on the First Indictment because of unreasonable delay as defined in Jordan and R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31,......
  • LAPLANTE v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...1 SCR 659 [Cody] is exceeded when delay is calculated from the swearing of the First Information: see, for example, R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319 at para 13 [Pennington 2019]; and R v Pennington, 2020 SKQB 198 at paras 33-46 [Pennington 2020]. He also argues the same ruling should apply to ......
  • R v Pennington,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 6, 2022
    ...In December of 2019, the trial judge issued his decision on the first delay application: R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319. He applied R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 SCR 631 [Jordan], finding that Mr. Pennington’s s. 11(b) Charter rights had been contravened because of unrea......
  • Gordon v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 15, 2020
    ...was referred to with approval in R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95 at para 17, 380 CCC (3d) 307 [Lemioer] and followed in R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319. 2. Applying the Legal [11]                    ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • PENNINGTON v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, 2020 SKQB 198
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 4, 2020
    ...and remitting the Direct Indictment back to the pre-trial conference judge. [16] Later, on December 10, 2019, a formal ruling reported at 2019 SKQB 319 was released which stayed proceedings on the First Indictment because of unreasonable delay as defined in Jordan and R v Cody, 2017 SCC 31,......
  • LAPLANTE v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 8, 2021
    ...1 SCR 659 [Cody] is exceeded when delay is calculated from the swearing of the First Information: see, for example, R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319 at para 13 [Pennington 2019]; and R v Pennington, 2020 SKQB 198 at paras 33-46 [Pennington 2020]. He also argues the same ruling should apply to ......
  • R v Pennington,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • January 6, 2022
    ...In December of 2019, the trial judge issued his decision on the first delay application: R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319. He applied R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 SCR 631 [Jordan], finding that Mr. Pennington’s s. 11(b) Charter rights had been contravened because of unrea......
  • Gordon v. R.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • September 15, 2020
    ...was referred to with approval in R v Lemioer, 2019 SKCA 95 at para 17, 380 CCC (3d) 307 [Lemioer] and followed in R v Pennington, 2019 SKQB 319. 2. Applying the Legal [11]                    ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT