Persaud v. Telus Corporation

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeLaskin, Lauwers and Brown JJ.A.
Citation2017 ONCA 479
Date09 June 2017
Docket NumberC62092

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 practice notes
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2020
    ...Breach, Condonation,, Damages, Potter v New Brunswick (Legal Aid Services Commission), 2015 SCC 10, Persaud v Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, Belton v Liberty Insurance Co. of Canada (2004), 72 OR (3d) 81 (CA), R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, Martin v Goldfarb (1990), 41 OR (3d) 161 (CA), leave ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 5 – 9, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2017
    ...that he had never been before a court of competent jurisdiction, or that he had been denied due process. Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479 [Laskin, Lauwers and Brown JJ.A.] Counsel: Zvulony, for the appellants Weisberg, for the respondents Keywords: Employment Law, Constructive Di......
  • Dismissal Without Cause
    • Canada
    • Working with the Law Collection Employment Law for Paralegals, 2nd Edition
    • May 12, 2022
    ...The difficulty is that condonation must be inferred from circumstances in which an employee’s intentions 48 Persaud v Telus Corporation , 2017 ONCA 479 at para 10. 49 McGuinty at para 17. 50 Ibid at para 20. 51 Supra note 44. 242 EMPLOYMENT LAW FOR PARALEGALS © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publica......
  • Riva Plumbing Ltd v Ferrari
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 29, 2025
    ...19 RBC Dominion Securities v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc., 2008 SCC 54, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 79, at para. 13. 20 Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, at para. 26; Correia v. Canac Kitchens, 2008 ONCA 506, 91 O.R. (3d) 353, at para. 99; and 1670002 Ontario Limited (Canadian Professional Rec......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • McGuinty v. 1845035 Ontario Inc. (McGuinty Funeral Home)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 17, 2020
    ...be inferred from circumstances in which an employee’s intentions may be unclear. As this court confirmed in Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, at paras 14-15, an employee must make his/her election within a “reasonable period of time”. Of course, reasonableness is not a rule but a......
  • Maggiacomo v. Yumusak
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 30, 2018
    ...claim against the moving party father. The four-part test for this intentional tort was set out in Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, at para. 26, as Four elements must be established by the plaintiff: 1. The defendant had knowledge of the contract between the plaintiff and the th......
  • Horfil Holding Corp. v. Queens Walk Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 27, 2019
    ...the third party to breach the contract; and (iv) the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the breach: Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, at para. 26. [23] The Plaintiffs have not alleged conduct on the part of the Moving Defendants that was intended to cause the breach or cau......
  • Carras v. Altus Group Limited
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 11, 2020
    ...a breach and it will not amount to constructive dismissal (Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2016 ONSC 1577, at para. 40, aff’d 2017 ONCA 479, at para. 14; Potter, at para. 37). IV – ANALYSIS   A.           Was Mr. Carras cons......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (December 14 ' December 18, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 23, 2020
    ...Breach, Condonation,, Damages, Potter v New Brunswick (Legal Aid Services Commission), 2015 SCC 10, Persaud v Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, Belton v Liberty Insurance Co. of Canada (2004), 72 OR (3d) 81 (CA), R v Lohrer, 2004 SCC 80, Martin v Goldfarb (1990), 41 OR (3d) 161 (CA), leave ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 5 – 9, 2017)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 20, 2017
    ...that he had never been before a court of competent jurisdiction, or that he had been denied due process. Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479 [Laskin, Lauwers and Brown JJ.A.] Counsel: Zvulony, for the appellants Weisberg, for the respondents Keywords: Employment Law, Constructive Di......
  • Ontario, Canada: Court Of Appeal Upholds $1.27 Million Damage Award For Constructive Dismissal
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 11, 2021
    ...of Appeal (OCA) noted that condonation must occur "within a reasonable time," as it had established in Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, and stated that this is a fact-specific determination made by the trial judge, whose finding is entitled to deference. The OCA Care must be tak......
  • Ontario, Canada: Court Of Appeal Upholds $1.27 Million Damage Award For Constructive Dismissal
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 10, 2021
    ...of Appeal (OCA) noted that condonation must occur "within a reasonable time," as it had established in Persaud v. Telus Corporation, 2017 ONCA 479, and stated that this is a fact-specific determination made by the trial judge, whose finding is entitled to deference. The OCA Care must be tak......
1 books & journal articles
  • Dismissal Without Cause
    • Canada
    • Working with the Law Collection Employment Law for Paralegals, 2nd Edition
    • May 12, 2022
    ...The difficulty is that condonation must be inferred from circumstances in which an employee’s intentions 48 Persaud v Telus Corporation , 2017 ONCA 479 at para 10. 49 McGuinty at para 17. 50 Ibid at para 20. 51 Supra note 44. 242 EMPLOYMENT LAW FOR PARALEGALS © 2022 Emond Montgomery Publica......