Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Kalmakoff,The Honourable Mr. Justice Ottenbreit,The Honourable Madam Justice Schwann |
| Citation | 2019 SKCA 76 |
| Docket Number | CACV3366 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 07 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 practice notes
-
Table of Cases
...50, 461, 541 Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76...........................................................................................................................152 Petipas v Petipas, [2000] NSJ No 133 (SC)...................................................................................
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...378 (CA); RS v TS, [2005] NBJ No 448 (SC); Coghill v Coghill, [2006] OJ No 2602 (SCJ). 228 KAMR v WHG, 2014 BCSC 103; Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at paras 70–71. See also Wehrhahn v Murphy, 2014 ABCA 229 Lutz v Lutz, 2014 SKQB 146 at para 10, Barrington-Foote J. 230 Herbert v Herbert,......
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...to a provisional order for spousal support dependent upon whether or not the mother relocated with the children, see Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76. See Waters v Conrod, 2007 BCCA 1024. See also Section C(5), above in this Katz v Katz (1983), 33 RFL (2d) 412 (Man CA), additional reasons ......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...to a provisional order for spousal support dependent upon whether or not the mother relocated with the children, see Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76. 161 See Waters v Conrod, 2007 BCCA 1024. See also Section C(5), above in this chapter; Katz v Katz (1983), 33 RFL (2d) 412 (Man CA), additi......
Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...v A.K.L., 2021 SKCA 124 at para 14 [ S.A.R.]; Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 at paras 13-15, [2001] 2 SCR 1014; Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at para 20, 30 RFL (8th) 341; and S.T. v J.T., 2019 SKCA 116 at para 44, 33 RFL (8th) 253. 41 In Barendregt, Karakatsanis J. emphasized the ......
-
PRIME v. PRIME, 2020 SKQB 326
...I bear in mind the concise comments of the Court of Appeal in Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76, 30 RFL (8th) 341 [Peterson]: 35 The wording of s. 16(8) makes it clear that the principal determination to be made in any case involving custody is the best interests of the child: Van de Perre ......
-
S.W.B.M. v C.S.M.,
...differently”. See also, for example, Ackerman v Ackerman, 2014 SKCA 86 at para 14, [2014] 10 WWR 429 [Ackerman]; and Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at para 20. As Caldwell J.A. also said, that standard of review was best set out in Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 SCR 1014 [......
-
GEORGE v. PENNER, 2020 SKQB 99
...The degree of success enjoyed by family law litigants and the corresponding effect on costs has been considered in: Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76; Antosh v Antosh, 2016 SKQB 321; R.E.G. v T.W.J.G., 2011 SKQB 269, 6 RFL (7th) [25] In R.E.G. v T.W.J.G, Justice Ryan-Froslie (as she then wa......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Case Comment ' Covid-19 Vaccination Of Children, O.M.S. v. E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243
...that while the views of the parents are entitled to serious consideration, the welfare of the child is paramount (Peterson v. Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76). The Court also provided a review of s 16 of The Divorce Act, which lists the relevant factors when assessing the best interests of a On asse......
-
Case Comment ' Covid-19 Vaccination Of Children, O.M.S. v. E.J.S., 2021 SKQB 243
...that while the views of the parents are entitled to serious consideration, the welfare of the child is paramount (Peterson v. Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76). The Court also provided a review of s 16 of The Divorce Act, which lists the relevant factors when assessing the best interests of a On asse......
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...50, 461, 541 Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76...........................................................................................................................152 Petipas v Petipas, [2000] NSJ No 133 (SC)...................................................................................
-
Determination of Income; Disclosure of Income
...378 (CA); RS v TS, [2005] NBJ No 448 (SC); Coghill v Coghill, [2006] OJ No 2602 (SCJ). 228 KAMR v WHG, 2014 BCSC 103; Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at paras 70–71. See also Wehrhahn v Murphy, 2014 ABCA 229 Lutz v Lutz, 2014 SKQB 146 at para 10, Barrington-Foote J. 230 Herbert v Herbert,......
-
Spousal Support on or After Divorce
...to a provisional order for spousal support dependent upon whether or not the mother relocated with the children, see Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76. See Waters v Conrod, 2007 BCCA 1024. See also Section C(5), above in this Katz v Katz (1983), 33 RFL (2d) 412 (Man CA), additional reasons ......
-
Spousal Support on or after Divorce
...to a provisional order for spousal support dependent upon whether or not the mother relocated with the children, see Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76. 161 See Waters v Conrod, 2007 BCCA 1024. See also Section C(5), above in this chapter; Katz v Katz (1983), 33 RFL (2d) 412 (Man CA), additi......