Pettkus v. Becker, 34 NR 384
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Judge | Laskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio |
| Citation | 34 NR 384,117 DLR (3d) 257,6 ACWS (2d) 263,[1980] SCJ No 103 (QL),1980 CanLII 22 (SCC),1980 CanLII 42 (SCC),19 RFL (2d) 165,[1980] 2 SCR 834,[1980] CarswellOnt 299,[1980] 2 SCR 450,8 ETR 143 |
| Date | 18 December 1980 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1243 practice notes
-
Miron and Valliere v. Trudel et al., [1995] 2 SCR 418
...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
...Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25 at para 30; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at p. 784; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at p. [53] Atlantic Lottery v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19. [54] Organigram Holdings Inc. v. Downton, 2020 NSCA 38 at para. 47; Fresco v. Canadian Imperia......
-
Miron v. Trudel, (1995) 81 O.A.C. 253 (SCC)
...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
-
Association de m_diation familiale du Qu_bec v. Bouvier,
...Inc. v. Bombardier Inc., 2014 SCC 35, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 800; referred to: Rathwell v. Rathwell, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 436; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; Richardson v. Richardson, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 857; Pelech v. Pelech, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 801; Lacroix v. Valois, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1259; Moge v. M......
Request a trial to view additional results
1144 cases
-
Miron and Valliere v. Trudel et al., [1995] 2 SCR 418
...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
-
Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc.,
...Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25 at para 30; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at p. 784; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at p. [53] Atlantic Lottery v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19. [54] Organigram Holdings Inc. v. Downton, 2020 NSCA 38 at para. 47; Fresco v. Canadian Imperia......
-
Marcinkiewicz v. General Motors of Canada Co.,
...Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25 at para 30; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at p. 784; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at p. 848. [70] 2018 SCC 52 at para. 41. [71] See also Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilley and Company, 2015 ONCA 305 at paras 39-46. [72] Carter v. Ford Moto......
-
Miron v. Trudel, (1995) 81 O.A.C. 253 (SCC)
...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
...Trust, Joint Family Venture, Reasonable Apprehension of Bias, Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, s. 29, Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 Paterson Veterinary Professional Corporation v. Stilton Corp. Ltd., 2019 ONCA 746 Keywords: Contracts, Specific Perf......
-
Agricultural Law Netletter - January 21, 2017 - Issue 364
...reviewed the law with respect to unjust enrichment at para. 96 to 99. At para. 169 to 170 she concluded, relying on Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 (SCC), that the Hendersons were obliged to repay the amounts Ficocelli had paid on their At para. 171, however, she concluded that Ficoc......
-
Agricultural Law Netletter Aug 14th 2017
...deprivation of the plaintiff; and (3) an absence of juristic reason for the enrichment (Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, at p. 848; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, 1992 CanLII 21 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762, at p. He observed [at para. 65] that all partie......
-
Haigh V. Kent: Unjust Enrichment And The Constructive Trust In The Context Of A Joint Venture
...Trust Remedy Both the Supreme Court of B.C. and the B.C. Court of Appeal relied on Justice Cromwell's statement in Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, that the existence of a joint venture, and the benefits it would create, was a rationale for granting a proprietary remedy in circumstan......
Request a trial to view additional results
92 books & journal articles
-
Digest: Input Capital Corp. v Gustafson, 2018 SKQB 154
...v Clement, 2008 SKQB 1, 67 RPR (4th) 124 Otter Farm & Home Co-operative v Sekhon, 2003 BCSC 32, [2003] BCTC 32 Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834, 34 NR 384, 117 DLR (3d) 257, 8 ETR 143, 19 RFL (2d) 165 Pizzolati & Chittaro Manufacturing Co. v May, [1972] 2 OR 606, 26 DLR (3d) 274 P......
-
Access to a Just Result: Revisiting Settlement Standards and Cy Près Distributions
...factors: (1) an enrichment; (2) a corresponding deprivation; and (3) an absence of a juristic reason for retaining the benefit.3 2 3 [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 [Pettkus]. Courts have sometimes implied further requirements for recovery in such cases. For example, the absence of a “special relations......
-
Table of cases
...CBR (4th) 10, [1996] OJ No 5495 (Gen Div) ...................................................................... 487 Becker v Pettkus, [1980] 2 SCR 834, 117 DLR (3d) 257, [1980] SCJ No 103 ....................................................................................... 108 Bedard v S......
-
Consequences of the Courts’ More Liberal Approach to the Admission of Relevant Evidence at the Authorization Stage
...Foundations of Unjust Enrichment: Six Centennial Lectures (Oxford: Victoria University Press, 2002) at 44. He cites Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834. 141 American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law Third, “Restatement of the Law: Restitution and Unjust Enrichment,” Tentative Draft No 4......
Request a trial to view additional results