Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeLaskin, Bora; Martland, Ronald; Ritchie, Roland Almon; Dickson, Robert George Brian; Beetz, Jean; Estey, Willard Zebedee; McIntyre, William Rogers; Chouinard, Julien; Lamer, Antonio
Date18 December 1980
Citation[1980] 2 SCR 834,34 NR 384,117 DLR (3d) 257,6 ACWS (2d) 263,[1980] SCJ No 103 (QL),1980 CanLII 22 (SCC),1980 CanLII 42 (SCC),19 RFL (2d) 165,[1980] CarswellOnt 299,[1980] 2 SCR 450,8 ETR 143
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1333 practice notes
  • Miron and Valliere v. Trudel et al.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 25, 1995
    ...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
  • Marcinkiewicz v. General Motors of Canada Co.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 7, 2022
    ...Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25 at para 30; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at p. 784; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at p. 848. [70] 2018 SCC 52 at para. 41. [71] See also Apotex Inc. v. Eli Lilley and Company, 2015 ONCA 305 at paras 39-46. [72] Carter v. Ford Moto......
  • Nova Chemicals Corp. v. Dow Chemical Co.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 18, 2022
    ...411; Apotex Inc. v. ADIR, 2017 FCA 23, 406 D.L.R. (4th) 572; Apotex Inc. v. ADIR, 2020 FCA 60, 172 C.P.R. (4th) 1; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; Philip Morris Products S.A. v. Marlboro Canada Ltd., 2015 FC 364, [2015] F.C.J. No. 1564 (QL); Hodgkinson v. Simms, [1994] 3 S......
  • Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., (2001) 152 O.A.C. 244 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 3, 2001
    ...al. (2001), 272 N.R. 135 ; 286 A.R. 201 ; 253 W.A.C. 201 ; 201 D.L.R.(4th) 385 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 102]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 237 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 , refd to. [para. Sorochan v. Sorochan, [1986] 2 S.C.R. 38 ; ......
  • Get Started for Free
1191 cases
  • Heller v. Uber Technologies Inc., 2021 ONSC 5518
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2021
    ...Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25 at para 30; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762 at p. 784; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 at p. [53] Atlantic Lottery v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19. [54] Organigram Holdings Inc. v. Downton, 2020 NSCA 38 at para. 47; Fresco v. Canadian Imperia......
  • Mancinelli v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2020 ONSC 1646
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 14, 2020
    ...SCC 10; Garland v. Consumers' Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834. [52] [2006] O.J. No. 2421 (Div. [53] 2013 SCC 57. [54] 2013 SCC 58. [55] 2013 SCC 59. [56] 2019 SCC 42. [57] (1843) 2 Hare 461. [58] Hunte......
  • Miron and Valliere v. Trudel et al., (1995) 181 N.R. 253 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • May 25, 1995
    ...321 , refd to. [para. 18]. Boronovsky v. Chief Rabbis of Israel, P.D. Ch [25] (1), 7, 35, refd to. [para. 28]. Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; 34 N.R. 384 ; 117 D.L.R.(3d) 257 ; 19 R.F.L.(2d) 165 ; 8 E.T.R. 143 , refd to. [para. Peter v. Beblow, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 980 ; 150 N.R. ......
  • Pro‑Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • October 31, 2013
    ...v; Garland v. Consumers’ Gas Co., 2004 SCC 25, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 629; Rathwell v. Rathwell, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 436; Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762; Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 269; United Australia, Ltd. v. Ba......
  • Get Started for Free
7 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 23-27)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 11, 2019
    ...Trust, Joint Family Venture, Reasonable Apprehension of Bias, Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3, s. 29, Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 Paterson Veterinary Professional Corporation v. Stilton Corp. Ltd., 2019 ONCA 746 Keywords: Contracts, Specific Perf......
  • Agricultural Law Netletter - January 21, 2017 - Issue 364
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 31, 2017
    ...reviewed the law with respect to unjust enrichment at para. 96 to 99. At para. 169 to 170 she concluded, relying on Pettkus v. Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834 (SCC), that the Hendersons were obliged to repay the amounts Ficocelli had paid on their At para. 171, however, she concluded that Ficoc......
  • Agricultural Law Netletter Aug 14th 2017
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 21, 2017
    ...deprivation of the plaintiff; and (3) an absence of juristic reason for the enrichment (Pettkus v. Becker, 1980 CanLII 22 (SCC), [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, at p. 848; Peel (Regional Municipality) v. Canada, 1992 CanLII 21 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 762, at p. He observed [at para. 65] that all partie......
  • Haigh V. Kent: Unjust Enrichment And The Constructive Trust In The Context Of A Joint Venture
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 16, 2014
    ...Trust Remedy Both the Supreme Court of B.C. and the B.C. Court of Appeal relied on Justice Cromwell's statement in Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, that the existence of a joint venture, and the benefits it would create, was a rationale for granting a proprietary remedy in circumstan......
  • Get Started for Free
128 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law Part Four
    • September 8, 2009
    ...(Gen. Div.) ................................................................................................... 444 Becker v. Pettkus, [1980] 2 S.C.R. 834, 117 D.L.R. (3d) 257, [1980] S.C.J. No. 103 ..................................................................................................
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Insurance Law. Second Edition Enforcing Insurance Contracts
    • June 23, 2015
    ...Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation, [1938] 2 All ER 267 (CA) .......................580, 581, 582, 597, 598 Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834 ........................................................... 443, 456 Pietrangelo v Gore Mutual Insurance Co, 2010 ONSC 568, aff’d 2011 ONCA ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Remedies: The Law of Damages. Third Edition Limiting Principles
    • June 21, 2014
    ...35 Pett v Pett, 2009 BCCA 232 ......................................................... 147, 148, 151, 154 Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834, 117 DLR (3d) 257, 19 RFL (2d) 165 ................................................................................... 284, 299 Pfob v Bakalik, 2004 ......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...and, in some provinces, on death.4 1 2 3 4 (1973), 13 RFL 185 (SCC). Rathwell v Rathwell (1978), 1 RFL (2d) 1 (SCC). Pettkus v Becker, [1980] 2 SCR 834, 19 RFL (2d) 165; Sorochan v Sorochan, [1986] 2 SCR And see Chapter 3, Section E. See Matrimonial Property Act, RSA 2000, c M-8; Family Law......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT