Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
JudgeOttenbreit, Ryan-Froslie and Leurer JJ.A.
Citation2020 SKCA 87
Date23 July 2020
Docket NumberCACV3395 and CACV3488

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation v Maurice Law Barristers and Solicitors (Ron S. Maurice Professional Corporation)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 15, 2024
    ...Zielke v Law Society of Saskatchewan, 2021 SKCA 156, 467 DLR (4th) 427 [Zielke], and Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87, [2021] 4 WWR 275, for general guidance in interpreting that provision. Drawing on the reasoning in those cases, the Chambers judge explained......
  • STANDING BUFFALO DAKOTA FIRST NATION v. RON S. MAURICE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OPERATING AS MAURICE LAW BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 21, 2023
    ...the legal framework in which they must analyze the meaning of various statutes. In Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87, 43 RFL (8th) 281 [Schenher], the Court provided the following concise overview in a matter involving solicitor’s 83 In Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes......
  • Merchant Law Group LLP v Slusar
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 29, 2022
    ...of action is not disclosed by the second amended statement of claim: see, for example, Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87 at paras 66–89, [2021] 4 WWR 275; FitzGibbon v Piters, 2012 BCCA 269, 33 BCLR (5th) 241; Merchant Law Group v McLeod & Co.,......
  • Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 15, 2020
    ...The sole issue before this Court is costs with respect to the following decision: Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87. The decision arose out of two appeals commenced by Phillips Legal Professional Corporation [Legal Corporation] against the respondents, Mervin ......
5 cases
  • STANDING BUFFALO DAKOTA FIRST NATION v. RON S. MAURICE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OPERATING AS MAURICE LAW BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • February 21, 2023
    ...the legal framework in which they must analyze the meaning of various statutes. In Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87, 43 RFL (8th) 281 [Schenher], the Court provided the following concise overview in a matter involving solicitor’s 83 In Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes......
  • Standing Buffalo Dakota First Nation v Maurice Law Barristers and Solicitors (Ron S. Maurice Professional Corporation)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • February 15, 2024
    ...Zielke v Law Society of Saskatchewan, 2021 SKCA 156, 467 DLR (4th) 427 [Zielke], and Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87, [2021] 4 WWR 275, for general guidance in interpreting that provision. Drawing on the reasoning in those cases, the Chambers judge explained......
  • Merchant Law Group LLP v Slusar
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • June 29, 2022
    ...of action is not disclosed by the second amended statement of claim: see, for example, Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87 at paras 66–89, [2021] 4 WWR 275; FitzGibbon v Piters, 2012 BCCA 269, 33 BCLR (5th) 241; Merchant Law Group v McLeod & Co., 2005 ABQB 8......
  • Herrnbock v Input Capital Corp.
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 27, 2020
    ...of statutory provisions are well‑settled and were recently enunciated in Phillips Legal Professional Corporation v Schenher, 2020 SKCA 87: [83] In Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 SCR 27, the Supreme Court of Canada endorsed the principle expressed by Elmer A. Driedger, Construct......
  • Get Started for Free