Piikani Nation et al. v. Kostic, [2015] A.R. Uned. 33 (CA)
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | Côté, Martin and O'Ferrall, JJ.A. |
| Citation | [2015] A.R. Uned. 33 (CA),[2015] A.R. Uned. 33,2015 ABCA 60 |
| Subject Matter | BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS,PRACTICE |
| Date | 09 February 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 183
...Court that have consumed significant judicial resources: see Piikani Energy Corporation (Re), 2013 ABCA 293 ; Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2015 ABCA 60; Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 53 ; Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2017 ABCA 259 ; Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 263 ; Piikani Nation v......
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 90
...decisions are to be obeyed and respected’ and that ‘solicitor-client privilege... [is] extremely important’”: Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2015 ABCA 60 at paras [15] Blakes also alleges that McMullen, in his draft Affidavit in support of this McMullen’s Blakes TPC Leave Application, references ......
2 cases
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABCA 183
...Court that have consumed significant judicial resources: see Piikani Energy Corporation (Re), 2013 ABCA 293 ; Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2015 ABCA 60; Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 53 ; Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2017 ABCA 259 ; Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 263 ; Piikani Nation v......
-
Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2020 ABQB 90
...decisions are to be obeyed and respected’ and that ‘solicitor-client privilege... [is] extremely important’”: Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2015 ABCA 60 at paras [15] Blakes also alleges that McMullen, in his draft Affidavit in support of this McMullen’s Blakes TPC Leave Application, references ......