Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Marina Paperny,The Honourable Mr. Justice Frans Slatter,The Honourable Madam Justice Sheila Greckol |
| Citation | 2018 ABCA 275 |
| Date | 23 August 2018 |
| Docket Number | 1601-0247-AC; 1701-0063-AC; 1701-0069-AC; 1701-0072-AC; 1701-0073-AC; 1701-0341-AC |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 practice notes
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP
...Reply Brief (by para #): (5) the ability of SVR to recover costs from third parties is not relevant: Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 at para (6-8) re Kostic’s Reply Brief paras 54-56, Rule 13.18(3) does not apply to applications under Rule 4.22 – I agree, contrary to wh......
-
Kostic v CIBC Trust Corporation
...leave to re-argue an appeal: Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 263 (an application by the Piikani Nation), and Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 (application by Kostic). [13] In a 2018 decision denying Kostic’s application to re-argue an appeal, the court noted that re-argument is an ......
-
Kostic v Alger
...Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 234 [Kostic]. It then dismissed Ms. Kostic’s application to reargue the appeals (Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 [Kostic Reargue]) and awarded costs in the sum of $92,000, including $14,500 in favour of the Grant Thornton Respondents (Piikani Nation v Kosti......
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP
...unsuccessfully sought to reargue appeals: Kostic v CIBC Trust, 2019 ABCA 173, Kostic v CIBC Trust, 2019 ABCA 29, Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275. [4]               In her letter of December 12, 2022, the appellant ......
Get Started for Free
9 cases
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP
...Reply Brief (by para #): (5) the ability of SVR to recover costs from third parties is not relevant: Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 at para (6-8) re Kostic’s Reply Brief paras 54-56, Rule 13.18(3) does not apply to applications under Rule 4.22 – I agree, contrary to wh......
-
Kostic v CIBC Trust Corporation
...leave to re-argue an appeal: Kostic v Piikani Nation, 2017 ABCA 263 (an application by the Piikani Nation), and Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 (application by Kostic). [13] In a 2018 decision denying Kostic’s application to re-argue an appeal, the court noted that re-argument is an ......
-
Kostic v Alger
...Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 234 [Kostic]. It then dismissed Ms. Kostic’s application to reargue the appeals (Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275 [Kostic Reargue]) and awarded costs in the sum of $92,000, including $14,500 in favour of the Grant Thornton Respondents (Piikani Nation v Kosti......
-
Kostic v Scott Venturo Rudakoff LLP
...unsuccessfully sought to reargue appeals: Kostic v CIBC Trust, 2019 ABCA 173, Kostic v CIBC Trust, 2019 ABCA 29, Piikani Nation v Kostic, 2018 ABCA 275. [4]               In her letter of December 12, 2022, the appellant ......
Get Started for Free