Piikani Nation v. McMullen
| Court | Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Graesser |
| Citation | 2024 ABKB 264 |
| Docket Number | 1001 10326 |
| Date | 07 May 2024 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 practice notes
-
Piikani Nation v. McMullen
...rejected McMullen’s continued “challenges to the validity of the Orders and the Nation’s claim for privilege”: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at para 123. [21] The Navigant Report has a long and complex history in some of the Case Managed Actions, which I will not repeat here. The......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...of privilege pertaining to them, may seek clarification from the Court on notice to Piikani Nation. See: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at paras 13-18; 2025 ABKB 481 at paras [12] In September 2014, McMullen applied for an order declarin......
-
Piikani Nation v. McMullen
...McMullen, 2020 ABCA 366 . [15] In 2024, among other things, CMJ Graesser found McMullen in contempt of court (Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 (Contempt Decision)), sanctioned McMullen for his contempt (Piikani v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 575 (Sanction Decision)), and disqualified Gowl......
-
Kostic v. Piikani Nation
...no court order permitting Ms. Kostic to use it in any way. [82] I recently dealt with this in two decisions in Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 and 2024 ABKB 575 , in which I found Mr. McMullen in contempt of court for using the Navigant Report without [83] Ms. Kostic claims that t......
Get Started for Free
10 cases
-
Piikani Nation v. McMullen
...rejected McMullen’s continued “challenges to the validity of the Orders and the Nation’s claim for privilege”: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at para 123. [21] The Navigant Report has a long and complex history in some of the Case Managed Actions, which I will not repeat here. The......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...affidavit (which included the Navigant Report) and a May 28, 2014 affidavit of Edwin Yellow Horn: see: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at paras 13-18; Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2025 ABKB 481 at paras 21-28. The June 2014 Order was confirmed in another order on September 2, 2014:......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...Case Managed Actions. It was summarized further in Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2025 ABKB 481 at para 21, citing Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at paras [8] The Navigant Application is supported by an October 16, 2025 Kosti......
-
Piikani Nation v. Raymond James Ltd.
...of privilege pertaining to them, may seek clarification from the Court on notice to Piikani Nation. See: Piikani Nation v McMullen, 2024 ABKB 264 at paras 13-18; 2025 ABKB 481 at paras [12] In September 2014, McMullen applied for an order declarin......
Get Started for Free
