Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Caldwell, Leurer and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 68 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Docket Number | CACV3601 |
| Date | 03 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
1499925 Alberta Ltd. v NB Developments Ltd.,
...Toronto Transportation Commission, 1937 CanLII 132 (ONCA), [1937] OR 377; R v Duhamel, 1981 ABCA 295 para 14; Poffenroth Agri Ltd v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 18. Further, the Prowse Order was not appealed and the court is functus in respect of the decision on the Appellant’s liabil......
-
Hawryliw v Smith, 2020 SKCA 92
...in mind the standard of review that would apply were leave to be granted and the appeal to proceed: see also Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 47. Additional considerations under the merit prong of the test include whether the appeal would “unduly delay the proceedings” or ......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...in mind the standard of review that would apply were leave to be granted and the appeal to proceed: see also Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 47. Additional considerations under the merit prong of the test include whether the appeal would “unduly delay the proceedings” or ......
-
CPC Networks Corp. v McDougall Gauley LLP,
...the Documents Order is interlocutory? The law on this point was usefully summarized by Kalmakoff J.A. in Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68, [2021] 2 WWR 302 [Poffenroth], is as follows: [15] At a very general level, an interlocutory decision is one made duri......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
1499925 Alberta Ltd. v NB Developments Ltd.,
...Toronto Transportation Commission, 1937 CanLII 132 (ONCA), [1937] OR 377; R v Duhamel, 1981 ABCA 295 para 14; Poffenroth Agri Ltd v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 18. Further, the Prowse Order was not appealed and the court is functus in respect of the decision on the Appellant’s liabil......
-
Hawryliw v Smith, 2020 SKCA 92
...in mind the standard of review that would apply were leave to be granted and the appeal to proceed: see also Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 47. Additional considerations under the merit prong of the test include whether the appeal would “unduly delay the proceedings” or ......
-
Yorkton (City) v Mi-Sask Industries Ltd., 2020 SKCA 109
...in mind the standard of review that would apply were leave to be granted and the appeal to proceed: see also Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68 at para 47. Additional considerations under the merit prong of the test include whether the appeal would “unduly delay the proceedings” or ......
-
CPC Networks Corp. v McDougall Gauley LLP,
...the Documents Order is interlocutory? The law on this point was usefully summarized by Kalmakoff J.A. in Poffenroth Agri Ltd. v Brown, 2020 SKCA 68, [2021] 2 WWR 302 [Poffenroth], is as follows: [15] At a very general level, an interlocutory decision is one made duri......
Request a trial to view additional results