Polischuk Estate v. Perry et al., 2014 BCSC 1089

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeJenkins, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterEXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS,WILLS
Citation2014 BCSC 1089,[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1089 (SC),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1089
Date17 June 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Lariviere v. Coad, 2019 BCSC 1691
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 3, 2019
    ...to destroy the originals is engaged. [70] The presumption is well articulated in the case authorities: Polischuk Estate v. Perry, 2014 BCSC 1089 at para. 60; Horton v. Bruce, 2017 BCSC 712 at paras. 46-53; Haider v. Kalugin, 2008 BCSC 930 at paras. 9-11; Lefebvre v. Major, [1930] S.C.R. 252......
  • Goold Estate, Re, 2016 ABQB 303
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 26, 2016
    ...(1985), 61 AR 96, [1985] AJ No 874 (Alta QB). A person without capacity lacks the capacity to revoke her Will: Polischuk Estate v Perry , 2014 BCSC 1089 at para 64, confirming the principles from Broome . [58] Jenkins J in Polischuk at para 66, summarized the applicable burdens as follows: ......
2 cases
  • Lariviere v. Coad, 2019 BCSC 1691
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 3, 2019
    ...to destroy the originals is engaged. [70] The presumption is well articulated in the case authorities: Polischuk Estate v. Perry, 2014 BCSC 1089 at para. 60; Horton v. Bruce, 2017 BCSC 712 at paras. 46-53; Haider v. Kalugin, 2008 BCSC 930 at paras. 9-11; Lefebvre v. Major, [1930] S.C.R. 252......
  • Goold Estate, Re, 2016 ABQB 303
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 26, 2016
    ...(1985), 61 AR 96, [1985] AJ No 874 (Alta QB). A person without capacity lacks the capacity to revoke her Will: Polischuk Estate v Perry , 2014 BCSC 1089 at para 64, confirming the principles from Broome . [58] Jenkins J in Polischuk at para 66, summarized the applicable burdens as follows: ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT