Popova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 326

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Citation2018 FC 326
Date22 March 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Hafiz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1273
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 d2 Dezembro d2 2018
    ...with his past misrepresentation, especially when the period of inadmissibility had expired (Popova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 326; Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 522). VI. [22] For the following reasons, the application for judicial review is allowed......
  • Masam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 751
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 d3 Julho d3 2018
    ...of Yuan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2001 FCT 1356, and Popova v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 326 (Popova), in asserting that a duty of fairness exists in study permit cases. The Court in Popova stated (at para 11): There are circumstances......
2 cases
  • Hafiz v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 1273
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 d2 Dezembro d2 2018
    ...with his past misrepresentation, especially when the period of inadmissibility had expired (Popova v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 326; Gu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2010 FC 522). VI. [22] For the following reasons, the application for judicial review is allowed......
  • Masam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 751
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 18 d3 Julho d3 2018
    ...of Yuan v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2001 FCT 1356, and Popova v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 326 (Popova), in asserting that a duty of fairness exists in study permit cases. The Court in Popova stated (at para 11): There are circumstances......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT