Potla v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 646
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FC 646 |
| Date | 27 May 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Gumtang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 758
...often require that the applicant be given an opportunity to address those concerns. [see Potla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 646 at paras 28-29; Lazar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 16 at paras [18] As the Officer expressed no concerns and made no findings......
-
Kupriianova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...which led them to arrive at such conclusions. As recently stated by Mr. Justice Norris in Potla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 646 at paragraph 24: An assessment of the reasonableness of a decision must be sensitive and respectful yet robust (Vavilov at paras 12-13). Reason......
2 cases
-
Gumtang v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 758
...often require that the applicant be given an opportunity to address those concerns. [see Potla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 646 at paras 28-29; Lazar v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 16 at paras [18] As the Officer expressed no concerns and made no findings......
-
Kupriianova v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...which led them to arrive at such conclusions. As recently stated by Mr. Justice Norris in Potla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 646 at paragraph 24: An assessment of the reasonableness of a decision must be sensitive and respectful yet robust (Vavilov at paras 12-13). Reason......