Potvin v. Rooke, 2019 FCA 285

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2019 FCA 285
Date19 November 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 practice notes
  • WORN OUT FACES: REPEAT SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS AT THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...Macfarlane, "Initial Report", supra note 10 at 32. (53) See e.g. Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 at paras 139, 188 [Meads]; Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285; Rooke v Williams, 2020 FC 1070. See also Paraclete Edward Jay Robin, "Getting assaulted obstructed nuisance and intimidated on law courts da......
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Turmel, 2022 FC 1526
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 9, 2022
    ...costs awards are paid in full. I note that a similar requirement was imposed by Chief Justice Marc Noël of the FCA in Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285 at paragraph 8. [52] The AGC asks that these restrictions apply equally to the commencement of new proceedings in the FCA. This remedy was ......
  • Dmyterko v Nissan Canada Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 21, 2021
    ...reconsideration rejected (17 September 2019), Toronto T-1200-18 (FC); Potvin v Rooke (3 March 2019), Calgary T-1546-18 (FC), aff’d 2019 FCA 285; Williams v Rooke (12 August 2019), Ottawa T-2105-18 (FC); Rooke v Williams, 2020 FC 1070. I am far from the only judge, Master, or staff me......
  • Rooke v. Williams, 2020 FC 1070
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 19, 2020
    ...ABQB 652; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 834; unreported March 1, 2019 Order of Justice Mosley on Federal Court File T-1546-18; Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285. [21] Regarding the latter point, a side-by-side comparison of the First Statement of Claim with the Statement of Claim filed by minister Alfr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • Canada (Attorney General) v. Turmel, 2022 FC 1526
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 9, 2022
    ...costs awards are paid in full. I note that a similar requirement was imposed by Chief Justice Marc Noël of the FCA in Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285 at paragraph 8. [52] The AGC asks that these restrictions apply equally to the commencement of new proceedings in the FCA. This remedy was ......
  • Dmyterko v Nissan Canada Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 21, 2021
    ...reconsideration rejected (17 September 2019), Toronto T-1200-18 (FC); Potvin v Rooke (3 March 2019), Calgary T-1546-18 (FC), aff’d 2019 FCA 285; Williams v Rooke (12 August 2019), Ottawa T-2105-18 (FC); Rooke v Williams, 2020 FC 1070. I am far from the only judge, Master, or staff me......
  • Rooke v. Williams, 2020 FC 1070
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • November 19, 2020
    ...ABQB 652; Potvin (Re), 2018 ABQB 834; unreported March 1, 2019 Order of Justice Mosley on Federal Court File T-1546-18; Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285. [21] Regarding the latter point, a side-by-side comparison of the First Statement of Claim with the Statement of Claim filed by minister Alfr......
  • Canada v. Zbarsky, 2023 FC 161
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 10, 2023
    ...costs awards are paid in full. I note that a similar requirement was imposed by Chief Justice Noël of the FCA in Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285 at paragraph 8 and by Justice Fothergill in Canada (Attorney General) v Turmel, 2022 FC 1526 at paragraph 51. [30] In conclusion, Mr. Zbarsky ha......
1 books & journal articles
  • WORN OUT FACES: REPEAT SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS AT THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.
    • Canada
    • University of British Columbia Law Review Vol. 55 No. 1, January 2022
    • January 1, 2022
    ...Macfarlane, "Initial Report", supra note 10 at 32. (53) See e.g. Meads v Meads, 2012 ABQB 571 at paras 139, 188 [Meads]; Potvin v Rooke, 2019 FCA 285; Rooke v Williams, 2020 FC 1070. See also Paraclete Edward Jay Robin, "Getting assaulted obstructed nuisance and intimidated on law courts da......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT