Priest v. Reilly

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeMacFarland, LaForme and Epstein JJ.A.
Citation2018 ONCA 389
Docket NumberC64686
Date19 April 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 16 – April 20, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 24, 2018
    ...Shaun Laubman and Laura M. Wagner, for the appellants Peter Mantas and Tala Khoury, for the respondent Keywords: Costs Priest v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389 [MacFarland, LaForme and Epstein JJ.A.] Counsel: Paul Duncan Reilly, acting in person Kathryn A. Junger, for the respondent Keywords: Family......
  • Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario's Intermediary Appellate Court.
    • Canada
    • Ottawa Law Review Vol. 53 No. 1, December 2022
    • December 22, 2022
    ..."Appeals", supra note 4 at 274. (81) Kennedy, "Appeals", supra note 4 at 281. (82) Good Guys Gas Bar, supra note 79; Priest v Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389; Williams v Young, 2018 ONCA 611 [Williams]; Wall v Shaw, 2018 ONCA 929 [Wall]; Gefen v Gaertner, 2019 ONCA 233 [Gefen]; Sub-Prime Mortgage Cor......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 13 ' 17, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 21, 2020
    ...2 S.C.R. 518, Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3, Mattina v. Mattina, 2018 ONCA 867, Marchildon v. Beitz, 2012 ONCA 668, Priest v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389, Christodoulou v. Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93 facts: The trial judge granted custody of the parties' child to the respondent wife, made an ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 29 – November 2, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 9, 2018
    ...v Berta, 2015 ONCA 918, Britt v Britt, [2000] OJ No 5981, Berta v Berta, Christodoulou v Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93, Priest v Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389 Facts: The appellant father commenced an application against the respondent mother for custody of their three children, and then brought a mot......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • Mattina v. Mattina
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • October 29, 2018
    ...v. Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93, 75 R.F.L. (6th) 266; Marchildon v. Beitz, 2012 ONCA 668, 23 R.F.L. (7th) 316; Priest v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389. In particular, this court in Christodoulou noted the cost implications of this confusion at para. The inconsistency in current appeal routes can be ......
  • Highland Shores Children’s Aid Society v. K.Y. and J.C.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 6, 2019
    ...v. Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93; Marchildon v. Beitz, 2012 ONCA 668; Mattina v. Mattina, 2018 ONCA 867; and Preist v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389. [5] The composition of all courts in Ontario is set out in the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43(“CJA”). In 1977, a pilot project in Hamilton......
  • Reilly v. Priest
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 15, 2019
    ...decision dated April 13, 2018, the Court of Appeal quashed his appeal because the appeal should have been taken to the Divisional Court. [2018 ONCA 389] [6]               Mr. Reilly did not launch his appeal to the Divisi......
3 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 16 – April 20, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 24, 2018
    ...Shaun Laubman and Laura M. Wagner, for the appellants Peter Mantas and Tala Khoury, for the respondent Keywords: Costs Priest v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389 [MacFarland, LaForme and Epstein JJ.A.] Counsel: Paul Duncan Reilly, acting in person Kathryn A. Junger, for the respondent Keywords: Family......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 13 ' 17, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 21, 2020
    ...2 S.C.R. 518, Young v. Young, [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3, Mattina v. Mattina, 2018 ONCA 867, Marchildon v. Beitz, 2012 ONCA 668, Priest v. Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389, Christodoulou v. Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93 facts: The trial judge granted custody of the parties' child to the respondent wife, made an ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 29 – November 2, 2018)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 9, 2018
    ...v Berta, 2015 ONCA 918, Britt v Britt, [2000] OJ No 5981, Berta v Berta, Christodoulou v Christodoulou, 2010 ONCA 93, Priest v Reilly, 2018 ONCA 389 Facts: The appellant father commenced an application against the respondent mother for custody of their three children, and then brought a mot......
1 books & journal articles