Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeOttenbreit, Schwann and Kalmakoff JJ.A.
Date10 August 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
Docket NumberCACV3444
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • Unifor Canada Local 594 v Consumers’ Co-Operative Refineries Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 9, 2021
    ...the appeal and, therefore, the appeal is moot. It argues that, just as in Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [PA Right to Life], the factual underpinnings of the appeal have changed and the relief sought on appeal by the......
  • R v Ochapowace Ski Resort Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 12, 2022
    ...in the absence of a live controversy? [121]     In Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [Prince Albert], Ottenbreit J.A. reviewed a number of decisions in this area and summarized their import by saying this: [54......
  • Patel v Saskatchewan Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...(Borowski v Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 SCR 342 at 353 [Borowski]; Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96 at para 47, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [Right to Life]; Wilson Olive and Friends of the Aquifer v Keys (Rural Municipality), 2020 SKCA 124 at p......
  • TAQA Drilling Solutions Inc v Yar Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 10, 2021
    ...Imm LR (4th) 175; Law v Cheng, 2016 BCCA 120 at para 6, 82 CPC (7th) 39; Prince Albert Right to Life Association v. Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96 at para 39, [2020] 10 WWR [5] In his reasons, Burrows J explained at para 4, that “a significant aspect of the contract between TAQA ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Unifor Canada Local 594 v Consumers’ Co-Operative Refineries Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 9, 2021
    ...the appeal and, therefore, the appeal is moot. It argues that, just as in Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [PA Right to Life], the factual underpinnings of the appeal have changed and the relief sought on appeal by the......
  • R v Ochapowace Ski Resort Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • May 12, 2022
    ...in the absence of a live controversy? [121]     In Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [Prince Albert], Ottenbreit J.A. reviewed a number of decisions in this area and summarized their import by saying this: [54......
  • Patel v Saskatchewan Health Authority,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 31, 2021
    ...(Borowski v Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 SCR 342 at 353 [Borowski]; Prince Albert Right to Life Association v Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96 at para 47, [2020] 10 WWR 603 [Right to Life]; Wilson Olive and Friends of the Aquifer v Keys (Rural Municipality), 2020 SKCA 124 at p......
  • TAQA Drilling Solutions Inc v Yar Holdings Inc,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 10, 2021
    ...Imm LR (4th) 175; Law v Cheng, 2016 BCCA 120 at para 6, 82 CPC (7th) 39; Prince Albert Right to Life Association v. Prince Albert (City), 2020 SKCA 96 at para 39, [2020] 10 WWR [5] In his reasons, Burrows J explained at para 4, that “a significant aspect of the contract between TAQA ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT