Privacy

AuthorRobert G. Howell
ProfessionProfessor. Faculty of Law University of Victoria British Columbia
Pages177-216
177
CHAPTER 4
PRI VACY
A. PERSPECTIVES OF A DIGITAL AGE
Historically, the concept of privacy was relatively peripheral to tele-
communications law. The traditional point-to-point media of princi-
pally telephone communications by a Canadian carrier is essentially a
matter of “carriage,” and section 36, Telecommunications Act(1993) pro -
vides: “Except where the [CRTC] approves otherwise, a Canadian car-
rier shall not control the content or inf‌luence the meaning or purpose
of telecommunications carried by it for the public.”1 Noted in other
contexts,2 section 36 prohibits a Canadian carrier from interfering with
the content of a communication, but it may also be interpreted to imply
exemption of a Canadian carrier from liability for content provided by
others.3 Additionally, other regulatory provisions may be relevant.4
1 Telecommunications Act, S.C. 1993, c. 38, s. 36.
2 See Chapter 2, te xt accompanying note 47.
3 See Chapter 2, te xt accompanying notes 228 –30 and Chapter 5, text accom-
panying note s 259–60 and 261–65, reportin g the CRTC to have purported to
exempt a Canad ian carrier from li ability for defamation or copyr ight infringe-
ment in any communic ation it carries. Such an exe mption may present a
constitution al and jurisdictiona l challenge to the exercise of w hat might be seen
as provinci al jurisdiction (common law tort or CivilCode del ict) under s. 92(13),
Constitution Ac t, 1867 (U.K.), 30 & 31 Vict., c. 3, reprinted in R .S.C. 1985, App.
II, No. 5, “Property and Civ il Rights in the Prov ince” in respect of defamat ion
and an excess of ju risdiction concerni ng copyright where the posit ion of pro-
viders of the me ans of communication is addre ssed in the Copyright Act, R.S.C.
1985, c. C-42.
4 See, for example, Ch apter 2, text accompanying note s 90–94.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LAW
178
These situations aside, a Canadian carrier would be responsible
under any federal legislative provisions concerning privacy, as well as
provincial legislation, tort, or delict for privacy violation. In Quebec,
legislative and Civil Code provisions provide signif‌icant privacy protec-
tion, and similarly, four common law provinces have enacted statutory
privacy protection.5 In the ordinary course of operations, however, a
carrier is unlikely to violate these provisions unless it is a direct party
to the dissemination of the content of any message.6 On the other hand,
point-to-mass broadcast media carry a higher risk of content-related
liability. This would include any recognized privacy interest.
Today, the digitized media of telecommunications has signif‌icantly
increased the scope of privacy protection within telecommunications.
Two broad dimensions are revealed. The f‌irst is the principal focus of
this chapter: the development of Canadian law to accommodate issues
of privacy contextually with digitized transactions and related links
to the analysis of interference with communications equipment, data
and information discussed in Chapter 3, copyright enforcement issues
in MP3 f‌ile sharing and the corresponding balancing of user privacy
interests by Internet Ser vice Providers (ISPs) discussed in Chapter 5,
and private international law presented in Chapter 6. While many as-
pects of privacy law are encompassed within these and other contexts,
the most signif‌icant is the protection of personal information under
the federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act
(PIPEDA)7and equivalents in three provinces, enacted specif‌ically in
response to privacy risks in the private sector collection of data and
especially during Internet telecommunications, though PIPEDA is not
limited to this or any particular medium. The second broad dimension
is still largely political, and any legal and policy response is more specu-
lative. Features of this dimension are simply identif‌ied in this chapter,
with a warning of the potentially erosive impact to interests in pri-
vacy that digitized media bring to individuals from the facilitation the
afford governments and other organizations to maintain surveillance
and to acquire information concerning individuals. Given the nature
and global scope of digitized media, both national and international
responses will be needed if, indeed, there is the political will to take
5 See Civil Code of Quebec, S.Q. 1991, c. 64, arts. 35– 41; and notes 69–72, below in
this chapt er.
6 See, for example, Dominio n Telegraph Company v. Silver (1882), 10 S.C.R. 238,
discus sed in Chapter 5, text accompanyi ng notes 263–65.
7 Personal Informatio n Protection and Electronic Document s Act,S.C. 2000, c. 5,
concerning “P rotection of Personal Informat ion in the Private Sector” [PIPEDA].
Privacy 179
signif‌icant privacy-related measures. Security and law enforcement in-
terests may discourage a response that is too focused on privacy.
Additionally, both dimensions must ref‌lect societal attitudes, which
are ambivalent with respect to the use of technology. Commentator
Jonathan Shaw provides an illustrative example. A person who waves
to a friend and has a photograph taken by a high-resolution camera
of his or her f‌inger prints is likely to call for privacy, but the taking
of f‌inger prints to gain entry to a popular event without delay may
present a preference for the convenience of the technology.8 This may
be especially so with younger people who have embraced digital com-
munications technologies as a “social network” through cellphone
voice and photographic wireless transmissions and the Internet media
of Facebook or MySpace, or other similar blogs, including the practice
termed “sexting,” noted as common among young persons, involving
the sharing of nude self-photographs.9 The result often is voluntary, ir-
retrievable disclosure of highly personal information. This may lead to
the conclusion that these users do not value the type of privacy protec-
tion that older generations have traditionally sought. Whether such a
conclusion is accurate or not,10 it has led to high-prof‌ile advice to young
people encouraging a protection of their privacy interests.11
Projections of the plight or otherwise of individual privacy in a
future ref‌lecting the embrace of technologies and related communi-
8 Jonathan Shaw, “Exp osed: The Erosion of Privacy in t he Internet Era” Harvard
Magazine (Septem ber–October 2009), online: Har vard Magazine http://harvard-
magazine.com/2009/09/privacy-erosion-in-internet-era.
9 See “U.S. Poll Finds Se xting Common among Young People” CTV News (3
December 200 9), online: CTV ww w.ctv.ca/CTVNews /TopStories/20091203/sex-
ting_poll_091203/.
10A survey repor ted in the United Kingdom in Septe mber 2009 that 54 percent
of the young people (age eleven to sixt een) wanted advice “about how to retain
privacy and not sh are personal informat ion” and a further 28 percent about
“how to retain secu rity of information.” See Ipsos Mori, Children and Young
People’s Access to Online Content on Mobile D evices, Games Consoles and Porta ble
Media Players, Report prepa red for Ofcom (September 2009), commented on
at Becta Emergi ng Technologies for Le arning, “Half of young pe ople want per-
sonal privac y advice,” online: http://emergingtechnologies.becta.org.uk/index.
php?section=etn&rid=14823.
11See warni ng given by President Barac k Obama to American school c hildren and
teenagers to be c autious about posting person al information on Facebook and
other blogs in cyb erspace: “Obama Warns Teens about Facebook R isks” Reuters
(9 September 2009), online: www.internetnews.com/breakingnews/article.
php/3838231/Obama+Warns+Teens+About+Facebook+Risks.htm.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT