Progress and Uncertainty: The Educational Rights of Special Needs Students in British Columbia

AuthorRobert Stack
PositionIs presently completing his articles at Priel, Stevenson, Hood and Thornton in Saskatoon
Pages42-65
in British Columbia
The Educational
Rights of Special
Needs Children
Progress and Uncertainty:
1Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms,
Part I of the Constitution
Act, 1982, being
Schedule B to the
Canada Act 1982
(U.K.) 1982, c. 11.
Robert Stack is
presently completing
his articles at Priel,
Stevenson, Hood and
Thornton in
Saskatoon. He
earned a Bachelor
(High Honours) and
Masters of Arts in
History at the
University of
Saskatchewan. In
May, 2000 he received
an LL.B. from the
University of Victoria.
Introduction
The following essay is a study of the legal rights of children with
“learning disabilities” (“LD”) and other special needs in the education
system of British Columbia. In this brief introduction, I will make a
few comments about the scope, structure and argument of the paper. The
exact subject of the paper is not easy to define. In terms of the kinds of
disability under study, there is some stress on “learning disabilities”; but
categories such as “LD” are, in both pedagogy and pathology, loose and
dynamic, and LD children often have other related conditions, such as
Attention Deficit Disorder (“ADD”). The paper is primarily about the rights
of those with special educational needs. However, issues related to purely
“physical” disabilities – such as access to buildings and transportation – will
receive little attention in this paper. In terms of its jurisdictional-geographic
boundary, the field of the paper is again inexact. The paper focuses on the
statutory and administrative regime of British Colombia, but case law from
other provinces is relevant because special education involves questions of
civil and human rights.
Indeed, the most interesting and significant issue in special
education law is the degree to which judicial interpretation of equality
provisions in provincial human rights statutes and the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms1(“Charter”) will overwrite education legislation. A
conclusion of this paper is that courts have only begun the work of
submitting special education regimes to the scrutiny of the Charter and
human rights acts. The results are likely to be progressive and may result in
some thoroughgoing alterations of educational practice, but there are many
issues to settle and the future course of jurisprudence is not likely to be
smooth. The problem of special education rights raises a host of difficult
questions and has already tested and taxed the principles of equality
jurisprudence.
The author would like
to thank Professor
William Neilson for
supervising the paper
as well as Maryse
Neilson and the
Learning Disability
Association of Lower
Vancouver Island for
sponsoring the
research. The Law
Society of British
Columbia generously
provided funding.
This paper is dedicated
to the special needs
students at St. Anne's
Elementary School in
Saskatoon, SK – long
may you run.
aPPeaLRREEVVIIEEWWOOFFCCUURRRREENNTTLLAAWWAANNDDLLAAWWRREEFFOORRMM
4422
The paper is divided into three sections: first, introductory
comments on the history and policy concerns of special education law;
second, an inspection of relevant statute provisions on special needs
education in British Columbia; and third, a study of recent case law on
special needs as an issue of human and civil rights. In this last section, I will
not only examine questions that have been the subject of litigation – such as
the right to integration – but also anticipate issues that parents may bring to
court in the future. These concerns include the crucial question of whether
school boards have a constitutional obligation to assess children for learning
disabilities or ensure that staff members have a level of special needs training.
A “New Minority”: Special Needs and Equal Rights
The practical question that this paper seeks to answer is the
following: what rights do children with learning disabilities and special
needs have in the education system of British Columbia? A court considering
this question has to deal with four areas of controversy in the recent history
of educational policy and human rights: the status of children in law and
traditional concepts of the role of the state and judiciary in protecting
vulnerable members of society; recognition in international human rights law
of both children’s rights and educational rights, and the impact of
international standards on domestic law; the tension between the legislature,
as the source of legal policy and legitimacy, and the courts, as guarantors of
justice; finally, evolving professional and social thought on the theory and
practice of special education and the nature of disability.
Special education law involves, first of all, the rights of children.
Common and civil law traditions have always recognized what we might call
the doctrine of “child vulnerability”. Children, according to this view, have a
4433
VVOOLLUUMMEE77,, 22000011

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT