Pro‑Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Rothstein, Marshall; Cromwell, Thomas Albert; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard
Citation2013 SCC 57,[2013] 3 SCR 477,[2013] ACS no 57,364 DLR (4th) 573,[2013] SCJ No 57 (QL)
Date31 October 2013
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number34282
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
206 practice notes
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 478 N.R. 202 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 4, 2015
    ...293 O.A.C. 204; 111 O.R.(3d) 346; 2012 ONCA 443, refd to. [para. 204]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Class Proceedings Act, S.O. 1992, c. 6, sect. 28 [para. 16]. Securities Act, R.......
  • Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 20, 2019
    ...suffered no loss so as to distinguish them from those who did. In Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477, the Court directed that, for a court to certify loss-related questions as common issues in a price-fixing class proceeding, it must be sat......
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 346 O.A.C. 204 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 4, 2015
    ...293 O.A.C. 204; 111 O.R.(3d) 346; 2012 ONCA 443, refd to. [para. 204]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Class Proceedings Act, S.O. 1992, c. 6, sect. 28 [para. 16]. Securities Act, R.......
  • Watson v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 2015 BCCA 362
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 19, 2015
    ...42; 61 Man.R.(2d) 282; 64 D.L.R.(4th) 335 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 345 B.C.A.C. 1; 589 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Bram Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. A.I. Enterprises Ltd. et al., [2014......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
159 cases
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 478 N.R. 202 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 4, 2015
    ...293 O.A.C. 204; 111 O.R.(3d) 346; 2012 ONCA 443, refd to. [para. 204]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Class Proceedings Act, S.O. 1992, c. 6, sect. 28 [para. 16]. Securities Act, R.......
  • Pioneer Corp. v. Godfrey, 2019 SCC 42
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • September 20, 2019
    ...suffered no loss so as to distinguish them from those who did. In Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation, 2013 SCC 57 , [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477, the Court directed that, for a court to certify loss-related questions as common issues in a price-fixing class proceeding, it must be sat......
  • Green et al. v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce et al., (2015) 346 O.A.C. 204 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court of Canada
    • December 4, 2015
    ...293 O.A.C. 204; 111 O.R.(3d) 346; 2012 ONCA 443, refd to. [para. 204]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Statutes Noticed: Class Proceedings Act, S.O. 1992, c. 6, sect. 28 [para. 16]. Securities Act, R.......
  • Watson v. Bank of America Corp. et al., 2015 BCCA 362
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 19, 2015
    ...42; 61 Man.R.(2d) 282; 64 D.L.R.(4th) 335 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23]. Pro-Sys Consultants Ltd. et al. v. Microsoft Corp. et al., [2013] 3 S.C.R. 477; 450 N.R. 201; 345 B.C.A.C. 1; 589 W.A.C. 1; 2013 SCC 57, refd to. [para. Bram Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. A.I. Enterprises Ltd. et al., [2014......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
39 books & journal articles
  • Catch and Release: Class Actions and Solvent Third Parties Under the Ccaa
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 11-2, March 2016
    • March 1, 2016
    ...chips (DRAM), a component used 2 3 4 5 6 [2013] 3 SCR 600 [Infineon]. [2014] 1 SCR 3 [Vivendi]. [2014] 2 SCR 725 [Bank of Montreal]. [2013] 3 SCR 477. [2013] 3 SCR 545. Please note that the factual summaries are based, in part, on those published by the same author in Class Actions in Quebe......
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...Ltd v Infineon Technologies AG, 2009 BCCA 503 at para 57 [Infineon BCCA]. 9 Ibid and para 68 [emphasis added]. 10 2013 SCC 57, [2013] 3 SCR 477 [Pro-Sys]. 11 Note that the workable methodology test was in fact described in the Supreme Court of Canada 2013 trilogy of decisions: AIC Limited v......
  • No Right Without a Remedy? the Potential Role of Class Actions in Police Accountability and Defending Charter Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 11-2, March 2016
    • March 1, 2016
    ...chips (DRAM), a component used 2 3 4 5 6 [2013] 3 SCR 600 [Infineon]. [2014] 1 SCR 3 [Vivendi]. [2014] 2 SCR 725 [Bank of Montreal]. [2013] 3 SCR 477. [2013] 3 SCR 545. Please note that the factual summaries are based, in part, on those published by the same author in Class Actions in Quebe......
  • The Unworkability of the Workable Methodology Standard
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...Ltd v Infineon Technologies AG, 2009 BCCA 503 at para 57 [Infineon BCCA]. 9 Ibid and para 68 [emphasis added]. 10 2013 SCC 57, [2013] 3 SCR 477 [Pro-Sys]. 11 Note that the workable methodology test was in fact described in the Supreme Court of Canada 2013 trilogy of decisions: AIC Limited v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT