Prowse et al. v. Noroozi

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeMcCARTHY
Docket Number19-139566
Date04 May 2021
Citation2021 ONSC 3099
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Buyers' Liability To Sellers In Aborted Real Estate Transactions - Part 2
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2021
    ...didn't understand the terms at the time they entered into the APS, or raising other complaints against the seller. In Prowse v. Noroozi, 2021 ONSC 3099 (CanLII), the buyer breached an APS to purchase a home in King City, Ontario, on no less than 10 occasions, most often by failing to pay a ......
  • 368230 Ontario Limited v. Booth
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 29, 2021
    ...368 also relies on the more recent decision of Justice McCarthy in Prowse et al v. Noroozi, 2021 ONSC 3099. In that case, the vendors successfully moved for summary judgment against a purchaser relative to a breached agreement of purchase and sale. The claim included a claim for loss of ant......
1 cases
  • 368230 Ontario Limited v. Booth
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • November 29, 2021
    ...368 also relies on the more recent decision of Justice McCarthy in Prowse et al v. Noroozi, 2021 ONSC 3099. In that case, the vendors successfully moved for summary judgment against a purchaser relative to a breached agreement of purchase and sale. The claim included a claim for loss of ant......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Buyers' Liability To Sellers In Aborted Real Estate Transactions - Part 2
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 4, 2021
    ...didn't understand the terms at the time they entered into the APS, or raising other complaints against the seller. In Prowse v. Noroozi, 2021 ONSC 3099 (CanLII), the buyer breached an APS to purchase a home in King City, Ontario, on no less than 10 occasions, most often by failing to pay a ......