Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality)
| Jurisdiction | Alberta |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable D.G. Redman |
| Citation | 2020 ABPC 53 |
| Docket Number | P1802600404 |
| Date | 05 March 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
New Pyke Decision May Create Uncertainty For Municipal Statutory Defences
...Act"). 2. See Ellis v City of Lethbridge, 2020 ABQB 783; Shanks v Calgary (City), 2003 ABQB 56; Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality),2020 ABPC 53. 3. Pyke v Calgary (City), 2022 ABQB 198 4. Limitations Act, RSA 2000, c L-12 ("Limitations Act"). * * * Brownlee LLP is a member of the Cana......
-
R v CG
...s 718.04 and s 718.201, and did not have the benefit of the reasons of Friesen. [62] The Defence relies significantly on R v Saddleback, 2020 ABPC 53, as that is case is post-Friesen. That case also involved sexual assault on two occasions of an intimate partner with an escalating degree of......
-
Pyke v Calgary (City)
...under MGA s 532 for keeping a sidewalk in a reasonable state of repair. The City also relied on Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 53 where ACJ Redman concluded that MGA s 533 relieved a municipality for liability under MGA s 532 for failing to keep a curb in a reasonable s......
-
Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality)
...and that the Plaintiffs had failed to mitigate those damages. [3] In my decision reported as Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 53, I dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for the reasons contained [4] The issue before me now is costs: the Defendant seeks costs; the Plaintiff sub......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
Pyke v Calgary (City), 2022 ABQB 198
...under MGA s 532 for keeping a sidewalk in a reasonable state of repair. The City also relied on Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 53 where ACJ Redman concluded that MGA s 533 relieved a municipality for liability under MGA s 532 for failing to keep a curb in a reasonable s......
-
Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 91
...and that the Plaintiffs had failed to mitigate those damages. [3] In my decision reported as Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 53, I dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for the reasons contained [4] The issue before me now is costs: the Defendant seeks costs; the Plaintiff sub......
-
R v CG, 2022 ABKB 696
...reasons of Friesen. [62]           The Defence relies significantly on R v Saddleback, 2020 ABPC 53, as that is case is post-Friesen. That case also involved sexual assault on two occasions of an intimate partner with an escalating degree of......
2 firm's commentaries
-
New Pyke Decision May Create Uncertainty For Municipal Statutory Defences
...Act"). 2. See Ellis v City of Lethbridge, 2020 ABQB 783; Shanks v Calgary (City), 2003 ABQB 56; Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality),2020 ABPC 53. 3. Pyke v Calgary (City), 2022 ABQB 198 4. Limitations Act, RSA 2000, c L-12 ("Limitations Act"). * * * Brownlee LLP is a member of the Cana......
-
Damaged Curbs Do Not Attract Automatic Liability
...property when water flowed over a sunken roadside curb during heavy rainfall in June 2017. In Pulkinen v Crowsnest Pass (Municipality), 2020 ABPC 53, the plaintiff alleged that a sunken curb's failure to block storm water runoff directly contributed to soil erosion in his home's backyard. I......