Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Neutral Citation | 2025 SCC 33 |
| Citation | 2025 SCC 33 |
| Docket Number | 40882 |
| Date | 31 October 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 practice notes
-
R v. Nagra
...are not unduly excessive": R. v. Gilmore, 2025 ONCA 517, at para. 36; see also at para. 34; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [32] Parliament has also expressly mandated restraint in sentencing. It has instructed that an offender "should not be deprived of liber......
-
R. v. Daniels
...Code?”: see R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, at para. 80; Parranto, at para. 36; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [185] The imposition of a just sentence for manslaughter is one of the most difficult tasks a sentencing......
-
R. v. Hudspeth
...not unduly excessive": R. v. Gilmore, 2025 ONCA 517, at para. 36; see also Gilmore, at para. 34; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [40] To arrive at a proportionate sentence, a sentencing judge must also account for any colla......
-
R. v. Patel
...Code”: R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, at para. 80; Parranto, at para. 36; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [95] In general, the objectively high gravity of the offences, the circumstances of the off......
Get Started for Free
15 cases
-
R v. Nagra
...are not unduly excessive": R. v. Gilmore, 2025 ONCA 517, at para. 36; see also at para. 34; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [32] Parliament has also expressly mandated restraint in sentencing. It has instructed that an offender "should not be deprived of liber......
-
R. v. Daniels
...Code?”: see R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, at para. 80; Parranto, at para. 36; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [185] The imposition of a just sentence for manslaughter is one of the most difficult tasks a sentencing......
-
R. v. Hudspeth
...not unduly excessive": R. v. Gilmore, 2025 ONCA 517, at para. 36; see also Gilmore, at para. 34; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [40] To arrive at a proportionate sentence, a sentencing judge must also account for any colla......
-
R. v. Patel
...Code”: R. v. Gladue, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688, at para. 80; Parranto, at para. 36; Quebec (Attorney General) v. Senneville, 2025 SCC 33, at para. [95] In general, the objectively high gravity of the offences, the circumstances of the off......
Get Started for Free
