R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S., (1991) 1 B.C.A.C. 213 (CA)

JudgeCarrothers, Hutcheon and Taylor, JJ.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateFebruary 13, 1991
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations(1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 213 (CA)

R.D. v. W.B.S. (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 213 (CA);

    1 W.A.C. 213

MLB headnote and full text

R.D. (appellant/respondent) v. W.B.S. and L.S. (respondent/petitioners)

(CA10666)

Indexed As: R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S.

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Carrothers, Hutcheon and Taylor, JJ.A.

June 5, 1991.

Summary:

B. was a 13 year old boy. B.'s natural mother and her present husband, who was not the boy's biological father, were married for nine years. The natural mother and her present husband (the petitioners) applied for an adoption order respecting B. and asked the court to dispense with B.'s biological father's consent to the adoption.

The British Columbia Supreme Court allowed the petitioners' application, dispensed with the biological father's consent and granted an adoption order. The court allowed liberal but specific continued access to B. by the boy's natural father.

Family Law - Topic 1569

Adoption - Consent of parents - Dispensing with consent - Grounds for - A boy's biological mother and her husband of nine years petitioned to adopt the boy without the consent of the boy's natural father - Numerous custody battles respecting the boy had taken place over a number of years - The natural father maintained a relationship with the boy but did not always support him financially - The trial judge granted the adoption order and dispensed with consent, but ordered continuing access by the natural father - The judge dispensed with consent because, inter alia, of the biological father's financial neglect, it was in everyone's best interests for litigation to end and the petitioners did not oppose continuing access.

Cases Noticed:

Re Alberta Registration 78-08-022716 (1986), 1 R.F.L.(3d) 1 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [paras. 9, 10, 16].

King v. Mr. & Mrs. B, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 87; [1985] 3 W.W.R. 1; 57 N.R. 17; 58 A.R. 275; 44 R.F.L.(2d) 113; 16 D.L.R.(4th) 576, refd to. [para. 15].

K.K. v. G.L. and B.J.L. - see King v. Mr. & Mrs. B.

King v. Lowe - see King v. Mr. & Mrs. B.

Statutes Noticed:

Adoption Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 4, sect. 8(8).

Counsel:

L.A. Kahn, for the appellant;

   K.P. Jensen, for the respondents.

This appeal was heard in Vancouver, B.C., on February 13, 1991, before Carrothers, Hutcheon and Taylor, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The following decision of the court was delivered by Carrothers, J.A., on June 5, 1991.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 practice notes
  • C.G. v. L.K.K. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 31, 2002
    ...v. Mr. & Mrs. B. A.B.M. v. W.D.G. (1988), 89 A.R. 128; 15 R.F.L.(3d) 378 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 41]. R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S. (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 213; 1 W.A.C. 213 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Harry M. Van Harten, for the plaintiff/applicant C.G.; John Shaw, for the defendants/respondents L.K......
  • British Columbia Birth Registration No. 1999-59-017333, Re, 2011 BCSC 830
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 24, 2011
    ...proceedings, in my view D.A.M. should continue to have a right of access, and I specifically so find: see, for example, R.D. v. W.B.S ., 1 B.C.A.C. 213, 81 D.L.R. (4th) 137; 33 R.F.L. (3d) 1; and, 27 A.C.W.S. (3d) 250. In that regard, nothing stands in the way of D.A.M. seeing the child, sh......
  • R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S., (1992) 138 N.R. 420 (Motion)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 16, 1992
    ...of Canada was dismissed in the case of R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S. , a case from the British Columbia Court of Appeal dated June 5, 1991. See 1 B.C.A.C. 213; 1 W.A.C. 213. See Bulletin of Proceedings taken in the Supreme Court of Canada at page 2678, November 15, 1991 and page 92, January 24, 1......
3 cases
  • C.G. v. L.K.K. et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 31, 2002
    ...v. Mr. & Mrs. B. A.B.M. v. W.D.G. (1988), 89 A.R. 128; 15 R.F.L.(3d) 378 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 41]. R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S. (1991), 1 B.C.A.C. 213; 1 W.A.C. 213 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Harry M. Van Harten, for the plaintiff/applicant C.G.; John Shaw, for the defendants/respondents L.K......
  • British Columbia Birth Registration No. 1999-59-017333, Re, 2011 BCSC 830
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • June 24, 2011
    ...proceedings, in my view D.A.M. should continue to have a right of access, and I specifically so find: see, for example, R.D. v. W.B.S ., 1 B.C.A.C. 213, 81 D.L.R. (4th) 137; 33 R.F.L. (3d) 1; and, 27 A.C.W.S. (3d) 250. In that regard, nothing stands in the way of D.A.M. seeing the child, sh......
  • R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S., (1992) 138 N.R. 420 (Motion)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • January 16, 1992
    ...of Canada was dismissed in the case of R.D. v. W.B.S. and L.S. , a case from the British Columbia Court of Appeal dated June 5, 1991. See 1 B.C.A.C. 213; 1 W.A.C. 213. See Bulletin of Proceedings taken in the Supreme Court of Canada at page 2678, November 15, 1991 and page 92, January 24, 1......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT