R.L. v. M.F.
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Ontario Superior Court of Justice |
| Judge | Kurz |
| Judgment Date | 12 May 2023 |
| Citation | 2023 ONSC 2885 |
| Docket Number | FS-20-00043623-0000 |
| Date | 12 May 2023 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 practice notes
-
Khan v. Khan
...Beninger; Shukalkin v. Shukalkina, 2012 ABCA 274 (C.A.); Remillard; Dancy; Lazare v. Heitner, 2018 ONSC 3604 (S.C.J.); R.L. v. M. F., 2023 ONSC 2885 (S.C.J.)). In addressing this factor, the court must keep in mind the various different indicia of compensatory entitlement and not simply the......
-
Rea-Cina v. Cina et al
...agreement is final, is on the consent of the parties, and the parties had legal advice: see Evans v. Evans, 2023 ONSC 3919; R.L. v. M.F., 2023 ONSC 2885; M. (A.C.) v. M. [29] In this case, the provisions related to the parenting coordinator and arbi......
-
Zaidi v. Zia
...credibility and reliability of the parties and other witnesses. Authorities Regarding Credibility and Reliability [33] In R.L. v. M.F., 2023 ONSC 2885, aff’d 2025 ONCA 595, 19 R.F.L. (9th) 39, I described, at paras. 118-124, the tools which the court must use to determine the credibility an......
-
Boswell v Ongko
...that this may well be the case for both T and J. The court must hear from them to make that determination. Discussion 98 In R.L. v. M.L., 2023 ONSC 2885, I considered at length a number of authorities regarding the rights of older children to have a say in parenting decisions which affect t......
Get Started for Free
17 cases
-
Khan v. Khan
...Beninger; Shukalkin v. Shukalkina, 2012 ABCA 274 (C.A.); Remillard; Dancy; Lazare v. Heitner, 2018 ONSC 3604 (S.C.J.); R.L. v. M. F., 2023 ONSC 2885 (S.C.J.)). In addressing this factor, the court must keep in mind the various different indicia of compensatory entitlement and not simply the......
-
Rea-Cina v. Cina et al
...agreement is final, is on the consent of the parties, and the parties had legal advice: see Evans v. Evans, 2023 ONSC 3919; R.L. v. M.F., 2023 ONSC 2885; M. (A.C.) v. M. [29] In this case, the provisions related to the parenting coordinator and arbi......
-
Zaidi v. Zia
...credibility and reliability of the parties and other witnesses. Authorities Regarding Credibility and Reliability [33] In R.L. v. M.F., 2023 ONSC 2885, aff’d 2025 ONCA 595, 19 R.F.L. (9th) 39, I described, at paras. 118-124, the tools which the court must use to determine the credibility an......
-
Evans v. Evans
...a decision-making component. This court cannot delegate its decision-making role without the consent of the parties. See R.L. v. M.F., 2023 ONSC 2885, M.(C.A.) v. M.(D.), 67 O.R. (3d) 181 (O.C.A.), K.M. v. J.R., 2022 ONSC 111), and Michelon v. Ryder 2016 ONCJ 60. I find that it is appropria......
Get Started for Free
