R. v. Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Strathy C.J.O., Harvison Young and Jamal JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 106 |
| Docket Number | C64718, C65154; C65173 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Date | 12 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 February 14, 2020)
...Evidence, Admissibility, Jury Instructions R. c. A, 2020 ONCA 112 Keywords: Criminal Law, Appeals, Inadequate Representation R. v. A, 2020 ONCA 106 Keywords: Criminal Law, Second-Degree Murder, Mens Rea, Severance, Evidence, Admissibility, Hearsay, Credibility, Prior Inconsistent Statements......
-
R. v. Hannan,
...cause of the victim’s death and if so, did he have the requisite murderous intent. [126] In R. v. Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106, the appellant argued the judge improperly instructed the jury on joint principal liability because there was no evidence she knew one of t......
-
R v Wallace,
...been adopted only if the witness (1) admits making the statement, and (2) acknowledges its truth based on present memory: R v Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106 at ¶ 136; leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2020] SCCA No 156. If unadopted, the statement may be used to assess credibility only.&#......
-
R v Dubroy-Clement,
...a firearm. The re-charge, unfortunately, did not clarify this point. [199] Most recently, in R v Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted at para 43 Finally, as the Crown points out, the decision in Kennedy is unhelpful ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Hannan,
...cause of the victim’s death and if so, did he have the requisite murderous intent. [126] In R. v. Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106, the appellant argued the judge improperly instructed the jury on joint principal liability because there was no evidence she knew one of t......
-
R v Wallace,
...been adopted only if the witness (1) admits making the statement, and (2) acknowledges its truth based on present memory: R v Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106 at ¶ 136; leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2020] SCCA No 156. If unadopted, the statement may be used to assess credibility only.&#......
-
R v Dubroy-Clement,
...a firearm. The re-charge, unfortunately, did not clarify this point. [199] Most recently, in R v Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106, the Ontario Court of Appeal noted at para 43 Finally, as the Crown points out, the decision in Kennedy is unhelpful ......
-
R. v. Medford,
...2008 ONCA 715, 238 C.C.C. (3d) 404, at para. 39; R. v. Candir, 2009 ONCA 915, 250 C.C.C. (3d) 139, at para. 113; R. v. Abdulle, 2020 ONCA 106, at paras. 136-38, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused, 39175 (August 20, 2020); R. v. Tat (1997), 117 C.C.C. (3d) 481 (Ont. C.A.), at p. 493. [24] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 10 February 14, 2020)
...Evidence, Admissibility, Jury Instructions R. c. A, 2020 ONCA 112 Keywords: Criminal Law, Appeals, Inadequate Representation R. v. A, 2020 ONCA 106 Keywords: Criminal Law, Second-Degree Murder, Mens Rea, Severance, Evidence, Admissibility, Hearsay, Credibility, Prior Inconsistent Statements......