R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas
Citation2020 SCC 11
Docket Number38165, 38304
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Date29 May 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R v Santiago, 2020 ABQB 446
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Agosto 2020
    ...related context, the Supreme Court considered racism in the context of racial profiling by police: R v Le, 2019 SCC 34; R v Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11. [7] As I consider the numerous decisions from trial courts across Canada, it is apparent that in most of the recent reported cases, Crown counsel h......
  • R. v. Li, 2020 SCC 12
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Junio 2020
    ...par. 38).   We recognize that neither level of court in this appeal had the benefit of this Court’s reasons in R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11. As explained in Ahmad, when investigating a suspected dial-a-dope operation, the police must have reasonable suspicion over the individual or ......
  • Help Me Out: Drawing Distinctions In The Entrapment Defence
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 Julio 2020
    ...doctrine is to prevent the profiling, stereotyping and targeting of marginalized or disadvantaged groups.13 Case Information R v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11 Docket: 38165; Date of Decision: May 29, 2020 Footnotes 1. R v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11 [Ahmad]. 2. R v. Mack, [1988] 2 SCR 903 (S.C.C.); R v. Barn......
  • R v Zyp, 2020 ABQB 491
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Agosto 2020
    ...for the Accused         [1] [1988] 2 SCR 903 at para 118 [2] 2020 SCC 11 at para 4. The Court also confirmed that “reasonable and probable grounds” cases can be helpful “in screening [CI information] for objective [reliability] markers” in a &......
3 cases
  • R v Santiago, 2020 ABQB 446
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 6 Agosto 2020
    ...related context, the Supreme Court considered racism in the context of racial profiling by police: R v Le, 2019 SCC 34; R v Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11. [7] As I consider the numerous decisions from trial courts across Canada, it is apparent that in most of the recent reported cases, Crown counsel h......
  • R. v. Li, 2020 SCC 12
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • 11 Junio 2020
    ...par. 38).   We recognize that neither level of court in this appeal had the benefit of this Court’s reasons in R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11. As explained in Ahmad, when investigating a suspected dial-a-dope operation, the police must have reasonable suspicion over the individual or ......
  • R v Zyp, 2020 ABQB 491
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 26 Agosto 2020
    ...for the Accused         [1] [1988] 2 SCR 903 at para 118 [2] 2020 SCC 11 at para 4. The Court also confirmed that “reasonable and probable grounds” cases can be helpful “in screening [CI information] for objective [reliability] markers” in a &......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Help Me Out: Drawing Distinctions In The Entrapment Defence
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 29 Julio 2020
    ...doctrine is to prevent the profiling, stereotyping and targeting of marginalized or disadvantaged groups.13 Case Information R v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11 Docket: 38165; Date of Decision: May 29, 2020 Footnotes 1. R v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11 [Ahmad]. 2. R v. Mack, [1988] 2 SCR 903 (S.C.C.); R v. Barn......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT