R. v. Aikman, 2019 BCCA 312
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Stromberg-Stein,The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith,The Honourable Mr. Justice Goepel |
| Docket Number | CA45067; CA45113 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 06 September 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Dhillon,
...detention. 90 Justice Crossin considered a number of decisions of this Court, including Webber and Patrick, as well as R. v. Aikman, 2019 BCCA 312, in which Justice Stromberg-Stein distinguished MacDonald and Mann on the basis that in MacDonald, the safety search was not conducted incident ......
-
R. v. Chandi,
...[81] Contrary to the appellant’s position, this case is not comparable to R. v. Aikman, 2019 BCCA 312, in which the Court found that the reasons did not disclose the route taken to convict on the impugned counts, or reveal any assessment of the evi......
2 cases
-
R v Dhillon,
...detention. 90 Justice Crossin considered a number of decisions of this Court, including Webber and Patrick, as well as R. v. Aikman, 2019 BCCA 312, in which Justice Stromberg-Stein distinguished MacDonald and Mann on the basis that in MacDonald, the safety search was not conducted incident ......
-
R. v. Chandi,
...[81] Contrary to the appellant’s position, this case is not comparable to R. v. Aikman, 2019 BCCA 312, in which the Court found that the reasons did not disclose the route taken to convict on the impugned counts, or reveal any assessment of the evi......