R. v. Akpalialuk (K.), 2016 NUCA 1

JurisdictionNunavut
JudgeSlatter, Smallwood and Schutz, JJ.A.
CourtNunavut Court of Appeal (Canada)
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,EVIDENCE,PRACTICE
Citation2016 NUCA 1,[2016] A.R. Uned. 25 (NUCA),[2016] A.R. Uned. 25
Date09 February 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Jerace (M.J.), [2016] A.R. Uned. 42 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Marzo 2016
    ...SCR 787, which re-stated the principled exception to the presumptive exclusion of hearsay evidence. See, more recently, R. v. Akpalialuk , 2016 NUCA 1. We do not see why this evidence as presented here would fail to meet that exception, particularly in light of the trial judge's fact findin......
  • R. v. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBPC 2
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 20 Enero 2017
    ...the absence of notice to the accused. Leave to appeal to the SCC refused (1990) 53. C.C.C. (3d) vii (S.C.C.). (see also R v. Akpalialuk 2016 NUCA 1; R v. John [2015] ONSC 2040; R. v. Truong [2008] 235 CCC (3d) 547; R v. Kettle [2008] Canlii 23689; R. v. Reid [2007] ABPC 34; R. v. Williams [......
2 cases
  • R. v. Jerace (M.J.), [2016] A.R. Uned. 42 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 15 Marzo 2016
    ...SCR 787, which re-stated the principled exception to the presumptive exclusion of hearsay evidence. See, more recently, R. v. Akpalialuk , 2016 NUCA 1. We do not see why this evidence as presented here would fail to meet that exception, particularly in light of the trial judge's fact findin......
  • R. v. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBPC 2
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Provincial Court of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 20 Enero 2017
    ...the absence of notice to the accused. Leave to appeal to the SCC refused (1990) 53. C.C.C. (3d) vii (S.C.C.). (see also R v. Akpalialuk 2016 NUCA 1; R v. John [2015] ONSC 2040; R. v. Truong [2008] 235 CCC (3d) 547; R v. Kettle [2008] Canlii 23689; R. v. Reid [2007] ABPC 34; R. v. Williams [......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT