R. v. Akpalialuk (K.), 2016 NUCA 1
| Judge | Slatter, Smallwood and Schutz, JJ.A. |
| Court | Nunavut Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 09, 2016 |
| Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
| Citations | 2016 NUCA 1;[2016] A.R. Uned. 25 (NUCA);[2016] A.R. Uned. 25 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBPC 2
...the absence of notice to the accused. Leave to appeal to the SCC refused (1990) 53. C.C.C. (3d) vii (S.C.C.). (see also R v. Akpalialuk 2016 NUCA 1; R v. John [2015] ONSC 2040; R. v. Truong [2008] 235 CCC (3d) 547; R v. Kettle [2008] Canlii 23689; R. v. Reid [2007] ABPC 34; R. v. Williams [......
-
R. v. Jerace (M.J.), [2016] A.R. Uned. 42 (CA)
...SCR 787, which re-stated the principled exception to the presumptive exclusion of hearsay evidence. See, more recently, R. v. Akpalialuk , 2016 NUCA 1. We do not see why this evidence as presented here would fail to meet that exception, particularly in light of the trial judge's fact findin......
-
R. c. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBCP 2
...Cour suprême du Canada refusée, (1990), 53 C.C.C. (3d) vii). On pourra se reporter également aux décisions suivantes : R. c. Akpalialuk, 2016 NUCA 1, R. c. John, 2015 ONSC 2040, R. c. Truong (2008), 235 C.C.C. (3d) 547, R. c. Kettle, 2008 CanLII 23689, R. c. Reid, 2007 ABPC 34, R. c. Willia......
3 cases
-
R. v. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBPC 2
...the absence of notice to the accused. Leave to appeal to the SCC refused (1990) 53. C.C.C. (3d) vii (S.C.C.). (see also R v. Akpalialuk 2016 NUCA 1; R v. John [2015] ONSC 2040; R. v. Truong [2008] 235 CCC (3d) 547; R v. Kettle [2008] Canlii 23689; R. v. Reid [2007] ABPC 34; R. v. Williams [......
-
R. v. Jerace (M.J.), [2016] A.R. Uned. 42 (CA)
...SCR 787, which re-stated the principled exception to the presumptive exclusion of hearsay evidence. See, more recently, R. v. Akpalialuk , 2016 NUCA 1. We do not see why this evidence as presented here would fail to meet that exception, particularly in light of the trial judge's fact findin......
-
R. c. O’DONNELL, 2017 NBCP 2
...Cour suprême du Canada refusée, (1990), 53 C.C.C. (3d) vii). On pourra se reporter également aux décisions suivantes : R. c. Akpalialuk, 2016 NUCA 1, R. c. John, 2015 ONSC 2040, R. c. Truong (2008), 235 C.C.C. (3d) 547, R. c. Kettle, 2008 CanLII 23689, R. c. Reid, 2007 ABPC 34, R. c. Willia......