R. v. Alec,

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Devlin
Citation2020 BCSC 1040
Date18 June 2020
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number72354‑2
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
5 practice notes
  • Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...BCSC 2314 at paras 154, 155; Galeano , supra note 108 at paras 72-74; R v Arana , [2022] OJ No 5020 (QL) at paras 46-48 (SC); R v Alec , 2020 BCSC 1040 at paras 72, 73; R v Rodriguez , 2021 ABQB 372 at paras 129-40; R v Nguyen , 2019 ONCA 178 at para 2. 124 Desilva , supra note 92 at paras ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...3295 ........................ 158 Albright , R v , [1993] NSJ No 581 (QL), 22 WCB (2d) 470 (PC) ...................... 165 Alec , R v , 2020 BCSC 1040 ................................................... 377 Alexson (TL) , R v , 2015 MBCA 5 ..................................... 87, 95, 178, ......
  • R. v. A.R., 2021 BCSC 1539
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 9, 2021
    ...Court requires imminent threat or harm in order for a search to be lawful: see for instance R. v. Howell, 2020 BCSC 1731; R. v. Alec, 2020 BCSC 1040; R. v. McPake, 2019 BCSC 751; R. v. Homeniuk, 2019 BCSC 216; R. v. French, 2018 BCSC 825; R. v. Hendrickson, 2018 BCSC 288; R. v. Robertson, 2......
  • R. v. Abdullahi, 2020 BCSC 1822
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 11, 2020
    ...v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18 at para. 76 and R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52 at para. 30. [31] A roadside stop is not a static event: R. v. Alec, 2020 BCSC 1040, at para. 32. In the course of a rapidly evolving situation, what started out as a lawful stop can quickly turn into an unlawful one. As suc......
  • Get Started for Free
3 cases
  • R. v. A.R.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 9, 2021
    ...Court requires imminent threat or harm in order for a search to be lawful: see for instance R. v. Howell, 2020 BCSC 1731; R. v. Alec, 2020 BCSC 1040; R. v. McPake, 2019 BCSC 751; R. v. Homeniuk, 2019 BCSC 216; R. v. French, 2018 BCSC 825; R. v. Hendrickson, 2018 BCSC 288; R. v. Robertson, 2......
  • R. v. Abdullahi,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • September 11, 2020
    ...v. Kang-Brown, 2008 SCC 18 at para. 76 and R. v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52 at para. 30. [31] A roadside stop is not a static event: R. v. Alec, 2020 BCSC 1040, at para. 32. In the course of a rapidly evolving situation, what started out as a lawful stop can quickly turn into an unlawful one. As suc......
  • R. v. Barth,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 1, 2021
    ...vehicle. There was no third officer on scene to drive the accused to the detachment. [116] The accused further refers me to R. v. Alec, 2020 BCSC 1040, a decision of Justice Devlin, wherein she held that the right to counsel had been infringed because the accused was left to sit in a police......
2 books & journal articles
  • Right to Counsel: Implementational Obligations
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...BCSC 2314 at paras 154, 155; Galeano , supra note 108 at paras 72-74; R v Arana , [2022] OJ No 5020 (QL) at paras 46-48 (SC); R v Alec , 2020 BCSC 1040 at paras 72, 73; R v Rodriguez , 2021 ABQB 372 at paras 129-40; R v Nguyen , 2019 ONCA 178 at para 2. 124 Desilva , supra note 92 at paras ......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Detention, Arrest and the Right to Counsel
    • September 19, 2024
    ...3295 ........................ 158 Albright , R v , [1993] NSJ No 581 (QL), 22 WCB (2d) 470 (PC) ...................... 165 Alec , R v , 2020 BCSC 1040 ................................................... 377 Alexson (TL) , R v , 2015 MBCA 5 ..................................... 87, 95, 178, ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT