R v Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100

JudgeMacKenzie J.A.; Madam Justice MacKenzie; Dickson J.A.; Bennett J.A.
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Case DateMonday March 11, 2019
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2019 BCCA 100
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • R v Hills,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...offender: production of cannabis if number of plants is more than six and less than 200) & sexual offences: The Queen v. Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100; 54 C.R. 7th 164 (possession of child pornography); The Queen v. E.O., 2019 YKCA 9; 374 C.C.C. 3d 338, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S......
  • Sentencing Charts
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...an appropriate sentence given conduct over months but positive community support; conditional sentence not appropriate R v Alexander , 2019 BCCA 100 8 months’ incarceration and 18 months’ probation, upheld on appeal • Pled guilty to possession of child pornography for regular viewing over c......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...296 Alexander , R v , 2017 ONCA 181 ........................................................ 620 Alexander , R v , 2019 BCCA 100 ........................................................ 537 Ali , R v , 1997 CanLII 2655, 98 BCAC 239 ................................................ 313 Al-Isa......
  • R. v. K.M., 2022 BCSC 360
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2022
    ...mandatory minimum sentence for possession of child pornography could not be constitutionally defended in light of Swaby, R. v. Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100 (discussed below) and R. v. Hamlin 2019 BCSC 2266 (discussed below). He declared the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment ......
  • Get Started for Free
18 cases
  • R v Hills,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 10, 2020
    ...offender: production of cannabis if number of plants is more than six and less than 200) & sexual offences: The Queen v. Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100; 54 C.R. 7th 164 (possession of child pornography); The Queen v. E.O., 2019 YKCA 9; 374 C.C.C. 3d 338, leave to appeal ref’d, [2019] S......
  • R. v. K.M., 2022 BCSC 360
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 4, 2022
    ...mandatory minimum sentence for possession of child pornography could not be constitutionally defended in light of Swaby, R. v. Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100 (discussed below) and R. v. Hamlin 2019 BCSC 2266 (discussed below). He declared the mandatory minimum sentence of six months imprisonment ......
  • R. v. Hagen, 2021 BCCA 208
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • May 28, 2021
    ...by indictment has been declared inoperative in this province on constitutional grounds. See R. v. Cole, 2021 BCSC 293; R. v. Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100; R. v. Hamlin, 2019 BCSC 2266; R. v. Swaby, 2018 BCCA 416, leave ref’d, [2019] S.C.C.A. No. [25] In seeking a conditional sentence, appellant......
  • R v Caribou, 2022 MBCA 95
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • December 6, 2022
    ...is an exercise of judicial discretion and is entitled to deference (see R v JED, 2018 MBCA 123 at para 87; and R v Alexander, 2019 BCCA 100 at paras 50, 56).  An appellate court is justified in intervening in a trial judge’s exercise of discretion only if a trial judge misd......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Sentencing Charts
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...an appropriate sentence given conduct over months but positive community support; conditional sentence not appropriate R v Alexander , 2019 BCCA 100 8 months’ incarceration and 18 months’ probation, upheld on appeal • Pled guilty to possession of child pornography for regular viewing over c......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Sentencing: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2024
    ...296 Alexander , R v , 2017 ONCA 181 ........................................................ 620 Alexander , R v , 2019 BCCA 100 ........................................................ 537 Ali , R v , 1997 CanLII 2655, 98 BCAC 239 ................................................ 313 Al-Isa......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT